Construct Overlap Between Employee Engagement and Job Satisfaction: A Function of Semantic Equivalence?

Keywords

Psychology, Job satisfaction, Employee engagement, Work engagement, Social psychology

References

• Construct Dimensionality of Engagement and its Relation With SatisfactionMaría del Pilar Domínguez Salgado — 2009
• The nature and causes of job satisfactionEdwin A. Locke — 1976
• Assessing the attitudes and perceptions of organizational membersCortlandt Cammann, Mark Fichman, G. Douglas Jenkins — 1983
• An R Companion to Applied RegressionSanford Weisberg, John Fox — 2010
• Psychometrics and psychologyPaul Kline — 1979
• Handbook of Employee Engagement: Perspectives, Issues, Research and PracticeJ. Bullock — 2011
• Handbook of latent semantic analysisThomas K. Landauer — 2007
• A Tale of Passion: Linking Job Passion and Cognitive Engagement to Employee Work PerformanceViolet T. Ho, Sze‐Sze Wong, Chay Hoon Lee — 2011
• The Measurement of Engagement and Burnout: A Two Sample Confirmatory Factor Analytic ApproachWilmar B. Schaufeli, Marisa Salanova, Vicente González‐Romá — 2002
• Invited Reaction: The Work Cognition Inventory--Initial Evidence of Construct Validity.Daniel A. Newman, Dana L. Joseph, Torrence E. Sparkman — 2011
• The psychology of attitudes.Muzafer Sherif, Hadley Cantril — 1946
• The construct of work commitment: testing an integrative framework.Amy Cooper-Hakim, Chockalingam Viswesvaran — 2005
• The impact of efficacy on work attitudes across culturesFred Luthans, Weichun Zhu, Bruce J. Avolio — 2006
• WORK ENGAGEMENT: A QUANTITATIVE REVIEW AND TEST OF ITS RELATIONS WITH TASK AND CONTEXTUAL PERFORMANCEMichael S. Christian, Adela S. Garza, Jerel E. Slaughter — 2011
• Predicting Survey Responses: How and Why Semantics Shape Survey Statistics on Organizational BehaviourJan Ketil Arnulf, Kai R. Larsen, Øyvind Lund Martinsen — 2014
• an Index of Job Satisfaction.BRAYFIELD, H Essenfelder Arthur, ROTHE — 1954
• The vocabulary problem in human-system communicationGeorge W. Furnas, Thomas K. Landauer, Louis M. Gomez — 1987
• Antecedents and consequences of employee engagementAlan M. Saks — 2006
• Understanding active psychological states: Embedding engagement in a wider nomological net and closer attention to performanceSharon K. Parker, Mark Griffin — 2011
• Assessing organizational change : a guide to methods, measures, and practicesLaura M. Graves, Stanley E. Seashore, Edward E. Lawler — 1984

Cited by

• Untangling the Predictive Nomological Validity of Employee EngagementBrad Shuck, Kim Nimon, Drea Zigarmi — 2017
• Deconstructing the Privilege and Power of Employee EngagementBrad Shuck, Joshua C. Collins, Tonette S. Rocco — 2016
• An Assessment of Pronouns as Linguistic Cues for Predicting Work AttitudesRobert W. Lion, Alexander R. Bolinger — 2016
• Co-workers with benefits: The influence of commitment uncertainty and status on employee engagement in romantic workplace relationshipsBrad Shuck, Jesse Owen, Megan Manthos — 2016
• The Employee Engagement Scale: Initial Evidence for Construct Validity and Implications for Theory and PracticeBrad Shuck, Jill L. Adelson, Thomas G. Reio — 2017
• Work Cognition and Psychological Well-Being: The Role of Cognitive Engagement as a Partial MediatorBaek‐Kyoo Joo, Drea Zigarmi, Kim Nimon — 2017
• Not if, but how they differ: A meta-analytic test of the nomological networks of burnout and engagementDaniel D. Goering, Akihito Shimazu, Feigu Zhou — 2017
• The Online Student Connectedness Survey: Evidence of Initial Construct ValidityTekeisha Denise Zimmerman, Kim Nimon — 2017
• The relationship between communication effectiveness and multicultural employees’ job outcomesAbdulelah Al-Tokhais — 2016
• Examining the importance of employee engagement in low-contact service modelsHeather Morgan — 2017
• Positive Public Service: Turning Purpose Into Progress By Changing How Government Works From the InsideBill Jones — 2017
• Definitional and Conceptual Muddling: Identifying the Positionality of Employee Engagement and Defining the ConstructBrad Shuck, Kobena Osam, Drea Zigarmi — 2017
• Job Satisfaction and Job Embeddedness as Predictors of Manufacturing Employee Turnover IntentionsAngie R. Skelton — 2017
• Controlling for Lexical Closeness in Survey Research: A Demonstration on the Technology Acceptance ModelDavid Gefen, Kai R. Larsen — 2017
• Psychology at workPhilippe Grégoire — 2017
• TESTING THE MEASUREMENT INVARIANCE OF DATA FROM THE UTRECHT WORK ENGAGEMENT SCALE BY GENERATIONAL COHORT FOR EMPLOYEES IN THE LEISURE AND HOSPITALITY INDUSTRYGreggory L. Keiffer — 2017
• The failing measurement of attitudes: How semantic determinants of individual survey responses come to replace measures of attitude strengthJan Ketil Arnulf, Kai R. Larsen, Øyvind Lund Martinsen — 2018
• Effective Strategies Small Retail Leaders Use to Engage EmployeesJanet L. Deskins — 2018
• Respondent Robotics: Simulating Responses to Likert-Scale Survey ItemsJan Ketil Arnulf, Kai R. Larsen, Øyvind Lund Martinsen — 2018
• Perceptions of customer service orientation, training, and employee engagement in Jamaica’s hospitality sectorKaren Johnson, Sunyoung Park, Kenneth R. Bartlett — 2018

Related papers

• Work engagement: An emerging concept in occupational health psychologyArnold B. Bakker, Wilmar B. Schaufeli, Michael P. Leiter — 2008
• WORK ENGAGEMENT AMONG HOSPITAL VOLUNTEERSEsther Cisneros, Rosa Martha Meda-Lara, María del Carmen Yeo Ayala — 2021
• POSITION PAPER Work engagement: An emerging concept in occupational health psychologyArnold B. Bakker, Wilmar B. Schaufeli, Michael P. Leiter — 2008
• Job stress and work engagementAkihito Shimazu — 2010
• Revisiting the interplay between burnout and work engagement: An Exploratory Structural Equation Modeling (ESEM) approachSarah‐Geneviève Trépanier, Claude Fernet, Stéphanie Austin — 2015
• Strengths of Character and Happiness: Introduction to Special IssueChristopher Peterson — 2006
• The application of new concepts in vocational psychology in counseling practiceS. Wiegersma, G. Wijers — 1983
• What Influences Work Engagement Among Registered Nurses: Implications for Evidence-Based Action.Arlene Pericak, Cameron W. Hogg, Kris Skalsky — 2020