A real-world test of artificial intelligence infiltration of a university examinations system: A “Turing Test” case study
Explore this paper's citation graph
Summary
A rigorous, blind study in which 100% AI written submissions into the examinations system in five undergraduate modules, across all years of study, for a BSc degree in Psychology at a reputable UK university found that 94% of AI submissions were undetected.
- Type
- article
- Published
- 2024-06-26
- Cited by
- 90
- References
- 36
- OpenAlex
- https://openalex.org/W38923941
- Semantic Scholar
- https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:270760583
Keywords
Medicine
References
- Students as Radical Agents of Change
- Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. Handbook I: Cognitive Domain
- Computing Machinery and Intelligence
- A five-dimensional framework for authentic assessment
- What computers still can’t do: a critique of artificial reason
- The logic theory machine-A complex information processing system
- Deep Speech 2 : End-to-End Speech Recognition in English and Mandarin
- Artificial intelligence - the very idea
- Measuring and Enhancing the Student Experience
- One Pixel Attack for Fooling Deep Neural Networks
- A general reinforcement learning algorithm that masters chess, shogi, and Go through self-play
- Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold
- ChatGPT for good? On opportunities and challenges of large language models for education
- GPT detectors are biased against non-native English writers
- Large language models encode clinical knowledge
- Large language models in medicine
- Perception, performance, and detectability of conversational artificial intelligence across 32 university courses
- Augmenting large language models with chemistry tools
- Attention is All you Need
- Neural Machine Translation by Jointly Learning to Align and Translate
Cited by
- Development of Electronic Module (E-Module) Based on Case Method in Science Subjects at Junior High School
- Can ChatGPT Be a Certified Accountant? Assessing the Responses of ChatGPT for the Professional Access Exam in Portugal
- Artificial Intelligence and the Sustainability of the Signaling and Human Capital Roles of Higher Education
- HULLMI: Human vs LLM identification with explainability
- The national student survey of GenerativeAI use among Australian university students
- Literacy in the Time of Artificial Intelligence
- An Empirical Study to Understand How Students Use ChatGPT for Writing Essays
- Higher education students’ perceptions of ChatGPT: A global study of early reactions
- Education and Training Assessment and Artificial Intelligence. A Pragmatic Guide for Educators
- Integrating Artificial Intelligence Into Higher Education Assessment
- Understanding AI Literacy for Higher Education Students: Implications for Assessment
- Perceptions of Students and Teachers Regarding Remote and Face-to-Face Assessments in the Evolving Higher Education Landscape
- Experience and attitudes toward the use of artificial intelligence in higher education
- ChatGPT theses. Identifying distinctive markers in AI-generated versus human-created texts: A multimodal analysis in university education
- Rhetorical distinctions: Comparing metadiscourse in essays by ChatGPT and students
- The impact of generative AI on academic integrity of authentic assessments within a higher education context
- Metadiscursive nouns in academic argument: ChatGPT vs student practices
- [AI-reflection] writing with machines? Reconceptualizing student work in the age of AI
- Does ChatGPT Write Like a Student? Engagement Markers in Argumentative Essays
- APPLICATION OF AI IN GRADING NEW QUESTION TYPES IN THE 2025 VIETNAMESE HIGH SCHOOL GRADUATION EXAM
Related papers
No related papers recorded.