Recommendations for assessing the risk of bias in systematic reviews of health-care interventions.
Explore this paper's citation graph
- Type
- article
- Published
- 2017-12-01
- Cited by
- 273
- References
- 57
- OpenAlex
- https://openalex.org/W2773013777
- Semantic Scholar
- https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:3541192
Keywords
Transparency (behavior), Workgroup, Psychological intervention, Systematic review, Risk assessment
References
- Systems to rate the strength of scientific evidence.
- Evaluation Roots: Tracing Theorists′ Views and Influences
- Effects of aromatherapy on sleep quality in patients: Protocol for an umbrella review
- Twelve recommendations for integrating existing systematic reviews into new reviews: EPC guidance.
- Qualitative research synthesis: methodological guidance for systematic reviewers utilizing meta-aggregation
- Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations
- Detection of Associations Between Trial Quality and Effect Sizes
- The methodological quality assessment tools for preclinical and clinical studies, systematic review and meta‐analysis, and clinical practice guideline: a systematic review
- Critical appraisal of AMSTAR: challenges, limitations, and potential solutions from the perspective of an assessor
- A tool to assess the quality of a meta‐analysis
- Influence of Reported Study Design Characteristics on Intervention Effect Estimates From Randomized, Controlled Trials
- Is a subgroup effect believable? Updating criteria to evaluate the credibility of subgroup analyses
- Evaluating non-randomised intervention studies.
- GRADE guidelines: 4. Rating the quality of evidence--study limitations (risk of bias).
- Automating Risk of Bias Assessment for Clinical Trials
- Testing the risk of bias tool showed low reliability between individual reviewers and across consensus assessments of reviewer pairs.
- GRADE guidelines: 8. Rating the quality of evidence--indirectness.
- GRADE guidelines: 2. Framing the question and deciding on important outcomes.
- Poor Reliability between Cochrane Reviewers and Blinded External Reviewers When Applying the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool in Physical Therapy Trials
- A review of critical appraisal tools show they lack rigor: Alternative tool structure is proposed.
Cited by
- The Role of Gut Microbiota in Gastrointestinal Symptoms of Children with ASD
- Assessing risk of bias in studies that evaluate health care interventions: recommendations in the misinformation age.
- Psychological and Pharmacological Treatments for Adults With Posttraumatic Stress Disorder: A Systematic Review Update
- Quality of life in individuals with patellofemoral pain: A systematic review including meta-analysis.
- Defining the role of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio in COPD: a systematic literature review
- Systematic Review of Real-World Studies Evaluating Characteristics Associated With or Programs Designed to Facilitate Outpatient Management of Deep Vein Thrombosis
- Antithrombotic Strategies After Bioprosthetic Aortic Valve Replacement: A Systematic Review.
- Persistent intestinal metaplasia after endoscopic eradication therapy of neoplastic Barrett's esophagus increases the risk of dysplasia recurrence: meta-analysis.
- Epidemiologic analysis of breast cancer incidence, prevalence, and mortality in India
- Xuefuzhuyu Decoction for Essential Hypertension: Meta-Analysis and Systemic Review
- Systematic review: epidemiology and response to direct‐acting antiviral therapy in genotype 6 chronic hepatitis C virus infection
- Evidence-Based Cognitive Rehabilitation: Systematic Review of the Literature From 2009 Through 2014.
- The Evidence Project risk of bias tool: assessing study rigor for both randomized and non-randomized intervention studies
- Efficacy and safety of dual SGLT 1/2 inhibitor sotagliflozin in type 1 diabetes: meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
- In Vivo and In Vitro Comparison of Internal and Marginal Fit of Digital and Conventional Impressions for Full-Coverage Fixed Restorations: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
- Critical review and evidence implications of paclitaxel drug-eluting balloons and stents in peripheral artery disease.
- Helping patients help themselves: A systematic review of self-management support strategies in primary health care practice
- Dry eye after refractive surgery: A meta-analysis.
- Dietary intakes of flavan-3-ols and cardiometabolic health: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials and prospective cohort studies
- Room for Improvement: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis on the Informed Consent Process for Emergency Surgery.
Related papers
- Reporting and Selection Bias in Case-Control Studies of Congenital Malformations
- Bias in clinical research.
- Where to look for the most frequent biases?
- The use of restricted controls to prevent recall bias in case-control studies of reproductive outcomes.
- Overweight and obesity in Native-American adolescents: comparing nonreservation youths with African-American and Caucasian peers.
- Bias Analysis Gone Bad.