Extractive summarisation of legal texts

Keywords

Rhetorical question, Computer science, Task (project management), Natural language processing, Structuring

References

• A Preliminary Study of Lexical Density for the Development of XML-based Discourse Structure TaggerCheung, L, Tom B. Y. Lai, Benjamin K. Tsou — 2001
• Résumé automatique de textes juridiquesAtefeh Farzindar — 2005
• Genre Analysis: English in Academic and Research SettingsJohn M. Swales — 1990
• Automatic Rule Induction for Unknown-Word GuessingAndrei Mikheev — 1997
• Teaching case-based argumentation through a model and examplesVincent Aleven — 1997
• Abstracting Concepts and MethodsHarold Borko, Charles L. Bernier — 1975
• Advances in Automatic Text SummarizationElizabeth D. Liddy — 2001
• Multi-Interval Discretization of Continuous-Valued Attributes for Classification LearningUsama M. Fayyad, Keki B. Irani — 1993
• Advances in kernel methods: support vector learningBernhard Schölkopf, Christopher J. C. Burges, Alexander J. Smola — 1999
• Introduction to the CoNLL-2001 shared task: clause identificationErik F. Tjong, Kim Sang, Hervé Déjean — 2001
• A Maximum Entropy Model for Part-Of-Speech TaggingAdwait Ratnaparkhi — 1996
• The PageRank Citation Ranking : Bringing Order to the WebLawrence M. Page, Sergey Brin, Rajeev Motwani — 1999
• Maximum Entropy Markov Models for Information Extraction and SegmentationAndrew McCallum, Dayne Freitag, Fernando C. N. Pereira — 2000
• Using maximum entropy for sentence extractionMiles Osborne — 2002
• The automatic construction of large-scale corpora for summarization researchDaniel Marcu — 1999
• Automatic summarisation of legal documentsClaire Grover, Ben Hachey, Ian Hughson — 2003
• Generalized Iterative Scaling for Log-Linear ModelsJ. N. Darroch, D. Ratcliff — 1972
• Enriching the Knowledge Sources Used in a Maximum Entropy Part-of-Speech TaggerKristina Toutanova, Christopher D. Manning — 2000
• Language Independent NER using a Maximum Entropy TaggerJames Curran, Stephen Clark — 2003
• Robust, applied morphological generationGuido Minnen, John M. Carroll, Darren Pearce — 2000

Cited by

• Combining Different Summarization Techniques for Legal TextFilippo Galgani, Paul Compton, Achim Hoffmann — 2012
• Towards Annotating and Extracting Textual Legal Case FactorsAdam Wyner, Wim Peters — 2010
• Improved Information Structure Analysis of Scientific Documents Through Discourse and Lexical ConstraintsYufan Guo, Roi Reichart, Anna Korhonen — 2013
• Concept relation extraction using natural language processing: the CRISP techniqueMohammed Abdelrahman Al Qady — 2008
• Singling out Legal Knowledge from World Knowledge. An NLP-based approachFrancesca Bonin, Felice Dell’Orletta⋄, Giulia Venturi⋄ — 2010
• Towards Annotating and Extracting Textual Legal Case ElementsAdam Wyner — 2010
• Sentence simplification, compression, and disaggregation for summarization of sophisticated documentsCatherine Finegan‐Dollak, Dragomir Radev — 2016
• LEXA: Building knowledge bases for automatic legal citation classificationFilippo Galgani, Paul Compton, Achim Hoffmann — 2015
• Summarization based on bi-directional citation analysisFilippo Galgani, Paul Compton, Achim Hoffmann — 2015
• HAUSS: Incrementally building a summarizer combining multiple techniquesFilippo Galgani, Paul Compton, Achim Hoffmann — 2014
• Query-based opinion summarization for legal blog entriesJack G. Conrad, Jochen L. Leidner, Frank Schilder — 2009
• Introducing LUIMA: an experiment in legal conceptual retrieval of vaccine injury decisions using a UIMA type system and toolsMatthias Grabmair, Kevin D. Ashley, Ran Chen — 2015
• Automatically classifying case texts and predicting outcomesKevin D. Ashley, Stefanie Brüninghaus — 2009
• Improving the comprehension of legal documentation: the case of patent claimsNadjet Bouayad‐Agha, Gerard Casamayor, Gabriela Ferraro — 2009
• Identification of Rhetorical Roles for Segmentation and Summarization of a Legal JudgmentM. Saravanan, Balaraman Ravindran — 2010
• Emerging AI & Law approaches to automating analysis and retrieval of electronically stored information in discovery proceedingsKevin D. Ashley, Will Bridewell — 2010
• Weakly supervised learning of information structure of scientific abstracts - is it accurate enough to benefit real-world tasks in biomedicine?Yufan Guo, Anna Korhonen, Ilona Silins — 2011
• A Weakly-supervised Approach to Argumentative Zoning of Scientific DocumentsYufan Guo, Anna Korhonen, Thierry Poibeau — 2011
• Extracting information from fictionSharon Givon — 2006
• Document and Corpus Level Inference For Unsupervised and Transductive Learning of Information Structure of Scientific DocumentsRoi Reichart, Anna Korhonen — 2012

Related papers

• The argumentation in GalatiansMika Hietanen — 2007
• Theoretical Considerations on Analytical Framework Design for the Interactions between Participants in Group Argumentation on Socio-Scientific IssuesJee-Young Park, Heui‐Baik Kim — 2012
• The basic categories and assumptions for Contemporary Chinese argumentation studiesZhou Qiang — 2016
• Analysis of Argumentation in Middle School Science Classroom Using Argument-Based InquiryMinji Lee, Jeongin Kwon, Jeonghee Nam — 2015
• The Art of Structuring, Bridging the Gap Between Information Systems Research and PracticeKatrin Bergener, Michael Räckers, Armin Stein — 2019
• Value Based Argumentation in Hierarchical Argumentation FrameworksSanjay Modgil — 2006
• Emotions and ArgumentationAaron Ben‐Ze’ev — 1995