Methodological index for non‐randomized studies (MINORS): development and validation of a new instrument
Explore this paper's citation graph
Summary
The aim of the present study was to develop and validate an instrument that can be used to determine the methodological quality of observational or non‐randomized studies in surgical research.
- Type
- article
- Published
- 2003-09-01
- Cited by
- 7,253
- References
- 15
- OpenAlex
- https://openalex.org/W2017044005
- Semantic Scholar
- https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:25546279
Keywords
Reliability (semiconductor), Randomized controlled trial, Medicine, Observational study, Conceptualization
References
- Validating scales and indexes
- Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology: a proposal for reporting. Meta-analysis Of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) group.
- A generalized concordance correlation coefficient for continuous and categorical data
- Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials.
- Treatment of open fractures of the shaft of the tibia.
- The hazards of scoring the quality of clinical trials for meta-analysis.
- Validation of an index of the quality of review articles.
- The feasibility of creating a checklist for the assessment of the methodological quality both of randomised and non-randomised studies of health care interventions.
- Meta-Analyses in Orthopaedic Surgery: A Systematic Review of Their Methodologies
- Statistics notes: Cronbach's alpha
- Ten‐year audit of randomized trials in digestive surgery from Europe
- Randomised trials in surgery: problems and possible solutions
- The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials
- The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials
- Clinimetrics
- Empirical Evidence of Bias
Cited by
- Complication rates and outcomes stratified by treatment modalities in proximal humeral fractures: a systematic literature review from 1970–2009
- The diagnosis and management of the Spitz nevus in the pediatric population: a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol
- The Interaction of Caseload and Usage in Determining Outcomes of Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty: A Meta-Analysis.
- Efficacy of type I thyroplasty after endoscopic cordectomy for early‐stage glottic cancer: Literature review
- Stability of maxillary protraction therapy in children with Class III malocclusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis
- One Versus 2 Venous Anastomoses in Free Flap Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
- Meta‐analysis of the prognostic role of perioperative platelet count in posthepatectomy liver failure and mortality
- Prosthetic Arthroplasty of Proximal Interphalangeal Joints for Treatment of Osteoarthritis and Posttraumatic Arthritis: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Comparing the Three Ulnar Digits With the Index Finger
- Meta-Analysis of Acetylsalicylic Acid Desensitization in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome.
- COVID-19 Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Laboratory Findings, Comorbidities, and Clinical Outcomes Comparing Medical Staff versus the General Population
- Enhanced perioperative care in liver and pancreat surgery
- Laparoscopic Peritoneal Lavage: A Definitive Treatment for Diverticular Peritonitis or a “Bridge” to Elective Laparoscopic Sigmoidectomy?
- Early clinical outcomes following laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair.
- Management & prognosis of endometrial hyperplasia
- Does Helicobacter pylori infection play a role in iron deficiency anemia? A meta-analysis.
- Biological Mesh in Contaminated Fields—Overuse without Data: A Systematic Review of Their Use in Abdominal Wall Reconstruction
- The Methods for the Synthesis of Studies without Control Groups
- Recovery after total hip or knee arthroplasty: physical and mental functioning
- Interventions to reduce maternal mortality in developing countries: a systematic synthesis of evidence
- Abdominal binders may reduce pain and improve physical function after major abdominal surgery - a systematic review.
Related papers
- A New Way to Think About Internal and External Validity
- Assessing the Validity of Clinical Trials
- Establishing the internal and external validity of experimental studies.
- Target Validity and the Hierarchy of Study Designs.
- Why a Trade-Off? The Relationship between the External and Internal Validity of Experiments