The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials
Explore this paper's citation graph
Summary
The revised CONSORT statement is intended to improve the reporting of an RCT, enabling readers to understand a trial's conduct and to assess the validity of its results.
- Type
- article
- Published
- 2001-04-14
- Cited by
- 5,548
- References
- 35
- Access
- Open access
- OpenAlex
- https://openalex.org/W3022626078
- Semantic Scholar
- https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:52871971
Keywords
Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials, Checklist, Randomized controlled trial, Statement (logic), Transparency (behavior)
References
- Current Controlled Trials: an opportunity to help improve the quality of clinical research
- What is meant by intention to treat analysis? Survey of published randomised controlled trials
- Guidelines for statistical reporting in articles for medical journals. Amplifications and explanations.
- CMAJ endorses the CONSORT statement. CONsolidation of Standards for Reporting Trials.
- Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement.
- Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology: a proposal for reporting. Meta-analysis Of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) group.
- Intention to treat analysis is related to methodological quality
- Treatment of attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder
- Consort statement on the reporting standards of clinical trials. MRC uses checklist similar to CONSORT's.
- Improving the Quality of Reports of Meta-Analyses of Randomised Controlled Trials: The QUOROM Statement
- Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials.
- Extending the CONSORT statement to cluster randomized trials: for discussion.
- Size and quality of randomised controlled trials in head injury: review of published studies
- Beyond CONSORT: need for improved reporting standards for clinical trials. Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials.
- Recommendations for Reporting Cost-effectiveness Analyses
- Use of the CONSORT statement and quality of reports of randomized trials: a comparative before-and-after evaluation.
- Recommendations for reporting cost-effectiveness analyses. Panel on Cost-Effectiveness in Health and Medicine.
- Towards evidence based radiation oncology: improving the design, analysis, and reporting of clinical outcome studies in radiotherapy.
- The quest for unbiased research: Randomized clinical trials and the CONSORT reporting guidelines
- The Quality of Reporting in Published Cost-Utility Analyses, 19761997
Cited by
- Squeaking in third- and fourth-generation ceramic-on-ceramic total hip arthroplasty: meta-analysis and systematic review.
- Effects of Soy on Health Outcomes: Summary
- A practitioner's guide to developing critical appraisal skills: the fundamentals of research.
- Can the Heinrich ratio be used to predict harm from medication errors
- Biostatistics Primer: What a Clinician Ought to Know Subgroup Analyses
- Problem Based Learning: An exploration of the method and evaluation of its effectiveness in a continuing nursing education programme
- Prevalence of chronic pain after traumatic spinal cord injury: a systematic review.
- Bowel wall “thumbprinting” in pseudomembranous colitis
- Accelerating Cancer Research Using Semantics−Driven Technology
- Behavior change intervention research in community settings: how generalizable are the results?
- Covariate adjustment in randomized controlled trials with dichotomous outcomes increases statistical power and reduces sample size requirements.
- Ask a silly question: two decades of troublesome trials.
- Insulin therapy for critically ill hospitalized patients: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
- Sensitivity analyses allowed more appropriate and reliable meta-analysis conclusions for multiple outcomes when missing data was present.
- A multidimensional meta-analysis of psychotherapy and pharmacotherapy for obsessive-compulsive disorder.
- Clinical trial design – towards better practices
- Arthrodesis or Total Replacement Arthroplasty for Hallux Rigidus: A Randomized Controlled Trial
- A Comparison of Methodologies from Two Longitudinal Community-Based Randomized Controlled Trials of Similar Interventions in Palliative Care: What Worked and What Did Not?
- Systems to rate the strength of scientific evidence.
- Ball-springs require more repair than bar-clip implant-supported mandibular dentures.
Related papers
- Are CONSORT checklists submitted by authors adequately reflecting what information is actually reported in published papers?
- [Quality assessment on reports of randomized controlled trials of oral and maxillofacial surgery in China].
- Reporting quality of randomized and non-randomized controlled trial abstracts from chicken research
- Reporting quality of randomized and non-randomized controlled trial abstracts from chicken research
- Improving the quality of reporting randomized controlled trials in cardiothoracic surgery: the way forward.
- Glossary for randomized clinical trials.
- A quality assessment of randomized controlled trial reports in endodontics