Participation and Pay

Keywords

Pay Equity, Merit pay, Nomination, Commit, Contingency

References

• Factors Affecting the Impact of a Company-Wide Incentive Program on ProductivityBrian E. Moore, Paul S. Goodman — 1973
• The Scanlon Plan: Causes and Correlates of SuccessJohn White — 1979
• How we should measure "change": Or should we?Lee J. Cronbach, Lita Furby — 1970
• Long-term impact of employee participation in the development of pay incentive plans: A field experiment revisited.Kenneth C. Scheflen, Edward E. Lawler, J. Richard Hackman — 1971
• Participation, Achievement and Involvement on the JobGeoffrey Ingham — 1971
• The experimental change of a major organizational variable.Nancy C. Morse, Everett Reimer — 1956
• Power relationships and group decision making in organizations.Michael T. Wood — 1973
• Participative decision making: A model, literature critique, and prescriptions for researchAaron Lowin — 1968
• A base-free measure of change.Ledyard R Tucker, Fred Damarin, Samuel Messick — 1966
• Impact of employee participation in the development of pay incentive plans: A field experiment.Edward E. Lawler, J. Richard Hackman — 1969
• Impact of employee participation in pay plan developmentG. Douglas Jenkins, Edward E. Lawler — 1981
• New Patterns of Management.Charles M. Bonjean, Rensis Likert — 1963
• Pay and organizational change.Lawler Ee, Bullock Rj — 1978
• Management and Organizational Development: The Path from XA to YBKatherine Phillips — 1972
• Pay and Organizational Effectiveness: A Psychological ViewGretchen Veigh — 1972
• The Scanlon Plan for Organization Development: Identity, Participation, and EquityCarl F. Frost, J Wakeley, Robert A. Ruh — 1974
• Participation, Achievement, and Involvement on the Job.Richard H. Hall, Martin Patchen — 1971
• Participation in Decision-Making: One More LookE. A. Locke, D. Schweiger — 1979
• HOW WE SHOULD MEASURE "CHANGE"—OR SHOULD WE? 1L. Cronbach, L. Furby — 2005

Cited by

• An Empirical Examination of a Merit Bonus PlanChristopher M. Lowery, Nicholas A. Beadles, M. M. Petty — 2002
• Método bivalorado para medições subjetivasCarlos Alberto Ferreira Bispo — 2010
• A TEST OF THE GROUP VALUES AND CONTROL MODELS OF PROCEDURAL JUSTICE FROM THE COMPETING PERSPECTIVES OF LABOR AND MANAGEMENTJane K. Giacobbe‐Miller — 1995
• The role of procedural and distributive justice in organizational behaviorSheldon Alexander, Marian N. Ruderman — 1987
• Organizational Change and Development in Human Service OrganizationsDavid Bargal, Hillel Schmid — 1993
• Developing commitment between managers and employeesAnn M. Brewer — 1996
• The Participation-Performance Controversy ReconsideredRobert P. Steel, Anthony J. Mento — 1987
• Relationships between organizational properties and service effectiveness in home care organizationsHillel Schmid, Ronit Nirel — 1995
• Predictors and outcomes of reactions to pay-for-performance plans.Marcia P. Miceli, Iljae Jung, Janet P. Near — 1991
• Gainsharing: a twenty-first-century strategy for a struggling Korean economyG. A. McLean, Eunsang Cho — 1998
• Participatory management and employee work outcomes: The moderating role of supervisor‐subordinate guanxiMillissa F.Y. Cheung, Weiping Wu — 2011
• Relationships of personal needs to managers' perceptions of compensationGeorge G. Gordon — 1989
• Factors Influencing Organizational Performance in Gainsharing ProgramsDong‐One Kim — 1996
• The beginning of a structural reform: reorganising the front line of a mental health service.Margaret Tobin, Grances Yeo, Luxin Chen — 2000
• The relationship between organizational properties and service effectiveness in residential boarding schoolsHillel Schmid, Dorit Bar-Nir — 2001
• Back to the Future? Performance‐Related Pay, Empirical Research, and the Perils of PersistenceJames L. Perry, Trent Engbers, So Yun Jun — 2009
• Participative Decision MakingRoger Schwarz — 1989
• Gainsharing: a few questions, and fewer answers.R. J. Bullock, Edward E. Lawler — 1984
• A Case Meta-Analysis of Gainsharing Plans as Organization Development InterventionsR. J. Bullock, Mark E. Tubbs — 1990
• The effect of participation on trust in the development of a workshop evaluation processM. Kim Raderstorf — 1995

Related papers

• Merit Pay Practices: Implications for Pay-Performance RelationshipsDonald P. Schwab, Craig A. Olson — 1990
• The pay-for-performance dilemma.Hills Fs — 1979
• When Changing from Merit Pay to Variable/Bonus Pay: What Do Employees Want?Jeremy B. Fox, Joan M. Donohue — 2008
• Wrestling with pay equity? Design your own merit pay delivery system.Brinks Jt — 1981
• Merit pay to pay for contribution: New developments in teacher performance payPeter H. Cole — 2010
• More Pay for Teachers and Administrators Who Do More: Incentive Pay Programs, 1987.Lynn M. Cornett — 1987