The EQUATOR Network: Enhancing the quality and transparency of health research through the use of reporting guidelines

Keywords

Medicine, Transparency (behavior), Quality (philosophy), Environmental health, Computer security

References

• Determining the reporting quality of RCTs in clinical pharmacology.Edward J. Mills, Yoon K. Loke, Ping Wu — 2004
• Improving the Quality of Reports of Meta-Analyses of Randomised Controlled Trials: The QUOROM StatementQUOROM Group, David Moher, Deborah J Cook — 1999
• Endorsement of the CONSORT statement by high impact medical journals: survey of instructions for authorsDouglas G. Altman — 2005
• Issues in the reporting of epidemiological studies: a survey of recent practiceStuart Pocock, Timothy Collier, Kimberley J Dandreo — 2004
• Endorsement of the STARD Statement by biomedical journals: survey of instructions for authors.Nynke Smidt, John Overbeke, Henrica C. W. de Vet — 2007
• Quality of reporting of diagnostic accuracy studies.Nynke Smidt, Anne WS Rutjes, Daniëlle van der Windt — 2005
• Epidemiology and reporting of randomised trials published in PubMed journals.An‐Wen Chan, Douglas G. Altman — 2005
• Reporting of prognostic markers: current problems and development of guidelines for evidence-based practice in the futureRichard D Riley, Keith R. Abrams, Alex J. Sutton — 2003
• Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: the STARD initiative. Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy.Patrick M. Bossuyt, Johannes B. Reitsma, David E. Bruns — 2003
• Systematic reviews of diagnostic tests in cancer: review of methods and reportingSusan Mallett — 2006
• Strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studiesErik von Elm, Douglas G. Altman, Matthias Egger — 2007
• The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trialsfor the CONSORT Group*, David Moher, Kenneth F. Schulz — 2001
• The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trialsDavid Moher, Kenneth F. Schulz, Douglas G. Altman — 2001

Cited by

• The use of systematic reviews and reporting guidelines to advance the implementation of the 3Rs.Marc T. Avey, Nicole Fenwick, Gilly Griffin — 2015
• Publication guidelines for quality improvement studies in health care: evolution of the SQUIRE projectFrank Davidoff, Paul B. Batalden, David Stevens — 2009
• Evidence-based Health Informatics: How Do We Know What We Know?Elske Ammenwerth — 2015
• Effects of glucose and blood pressure control on diabetic kidney disease in old patients with type 2 diabetesTzu-En Wu, Yu‐Hsin Chen, Harn-Shen Chen — 2014
• Publication Guidelines for Quality Improvement Studies in Health Care: Evolution of the SQUIRE ProjectFrank Davidoff, Paul B. Batalden, Greg Ogrinc — 2008
• Reporting guidelines for modelling studiesCarol Bennett, Douglas G. Manuel — 2012
• A systematic review of studies evaluating Australian indigenous community development projects: the extent of community participation, their methodological quality and their outcomesMieke Snijder, Anthony Shakeshaft, Annemarie Wagemakers — 2015
• Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research: A Synthesis of RecommendationsBridget C. OʼBrien, Ilene Harris, Thomas J. Beckman — 2014
• Research philosophy in pharmacy practice: necessity and relevanceWin Winit-Watjana — 2016
• Statistical methods and errors in family medicine articles between 2010 and 2014-Suez Canal University, Egypt: A cross-sectional studyHebatallah Nour-Eldein — 2016
• How have research questions and methods used in clinical trials published in Clinical Rehabilitation changed over the last 30 years?Nancy E. Mayo, Navaldeep Kaur, Skye Barbic — 2016
• Author's reply to the letter to editor, “Yakson touch as a part of early intervention in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit: A systematic narrative review - comment”Asir John Samuel — 2016
• ‘Spin’ in reports of clinical researchKamal R Mahtani — 2016
• Improving Evaluation to Address the Unintended Consequences of Health Information TechnologyElske Ammenwerth, Hannele Hyppönen, Nicolette F. de Keizer — 2016
• Hematology journals do not sufficiently adhere to reporting guidelines: a systematic reviewCole Wayant, Christian Smith, Mario Sims — 2017
• Case study and case-based research in emergency nursing and care: Theoretical foundations and practical application in paramedic pre-hospital clinical judgment and decision-making of patients with mental illness.Ramon Z. Shaban, Julie Considine, Margaret Fry — 2017
• Standardisation and validation of a triage system in a private hospital group in the United Arab EmiratesEnrico Dippenaar — 2016
• The evidence base for the use of acupuncture to treat Ménière's disease is weakH Lee — 2016
• Development of an education campaign to reduce delays in pre-hospital response to strokeOn behalf of the Educazione e Ritardo di Ospedalizzazione (E.R.O.I) study group, Caterina Caminiti, Peter J. Schulz — 2017
• Scoping review identifies significant number of knowledge translation theories, models, and frameworks with limited use.Lisa Strifler, Roberta Cardoso, Jessie McGowan — 2018

Related papers

• Achieving Evidence-based Improvement and Transparency in Higher Education: The current status and challenges regarding data utilization and disclosure in JapanTomoko Torii, Yuji Okada — 2017
• From Board to Bedside: How the Application of Financial Structures to Safety and Quality Can Drive Accountability in a Large Health Care System.J. Matthew Austin, Renee Demski, Tiffany Callender — 2017
• Improving Patient Safety Via Information Transparency and Performance-Improvement InfrastructureKathy Ricossa — 2019
• The foundation transparency and its establishment of evaluation index systemZhou Yong-me — 2013
• The impact of emerging standards adoption on automated quality reportingPaul Fu, Daniel Rosenthal, Joshua M. Pevnick — 2012