Developing and Evaluating Composite Measures of Cancer Care Quality
Explore this paper's citation graph
Summary
The evidence did not support any single approach for generating cancer care composite measures and weak associations across different care domains suggest that low-quality and high-quality cancer care delivery may coexist within Veterans Affairs hospitals.
- Type
- article
- Published
- 2015-01-01
- Cited by
- 10
- References
- 41
- OpenAlex
- https://openalex.org/W25373407
- Semantic Scholar
- https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:24258141
Keywords
Computer science, World Wide Web, Computer graphics (images)
References
- Quick and Easy Implementation of the Benjamini-Hochberg Procedure for Controlling the False Positive Rate in Multiple Comparisons
- Ensuring Quality Cancer Care
- Immediate versus deferred treatment for advanced prostatic cancer: initial results of the Medical Research Council Trial. The Medical Research Council Prostate Cancer Working Party Investigators Group.
- Exploratory factor analyses of the CAHPS Hospital Pilot Survey responses across and within medical, surgical, and obstetric services.
- Combining Health Plan Performance Indicators into Simpler Composite Measures
- External-beam radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer.
- The National Comprehensive Cancer Network
- A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation.
- Studies on prostatic cancer. I. The effect of castration, of estrogen and androgen injection on serum phosphatases in metastatic carcinoma of the prostate.
- The Effect of Financial Incentives on Hospitals That Serve Poor Patients
- Multistakeholder Perspectives on Composite Measures of Ambulatory Care Quality
- Controlling Error in Multiple Comparisons, with Examples from State-to-State Differences in Educational Achievement
- STUDIES ON PROSTATIC CANCER: II. THE EFFECTS OF CASTRATION ON ADVANCED CARCINOMA OF THE PROSTATE GLAND
- Alternative Pay-for-Performance Scoring Methods: Implications for Quality Improvement and Patient Outcomes
- Empirically Derived Composite Measures of Surgical Performance
- Quality of Care for Older Patients With Cancer in the Veterans Health Administration Versus the Private Sector
- Quality of care for colorectal cancer in a fee‐for‐service and health maintenance organization practice
- Pay for performance, quality of care, and outcomes in acute myocardial infarction.
- Practice guideline for the role of combination chemotherapy in the initial management of limited-stage small-cell lung cancer.
- Statistical issues in reporting quality data: small samples and casemix variation.
Cited by
- Comparing the Quality of Ambulatory Surgical Care for Skin Cancer in a Veterans Affairs Clinic and a Fee-For-Service Practice Using Clinical and Patient-Reported Measures
- The Role of Quality Measures in Improving Breast Cancer Care in Low-Income Countries
- Comparison of Approaches for Aggregating Quality Measures in Population‐based Payment Models
- Comparing textbook outcomes among patients undergoing surgery for cancer at U. S. News & World Report ranked hospitals
- Quality indicators in lung cancer: a review and analysis
- Concordance of Hospital Ranks and Category Ratings Using the Current Technical Specification of US Hospital Star Ratings and Reasonable Alternative Specifications
- Composite measures of quality of health care: Evidence mapping of methodology and reporting
- Measurement that matters: A systematic review and modified Delphi of multidisciplinary colorectal cancer quality indicators
- International standards of care in thoracic oncology: A narrative review of clinical quality indicators.
Related papers
No related papers recorded.