Representativeness revisited: Attribute substitution in intuitive judgment.

References

• The adaptive decision maker: Name indexJohn W. Payne, James R. Bettman, Eric J. Johnson — 1993
• Clinical Assessment of the Probability of Coronary Artery DiseaseBertolt Brecht — 1992
• Bringing the models together: An empirical approach to combining variables used to explain health actionsAnthony L. McCall — 1980
• The calibration and resolution of confidence in perceptual judgmentsI. Revilla — 1994
• Unpacking, repacking, and anchoring: advances in support theory.Matthew R. Pincus — 1997
• Beyond Time DiscountingDražen Prelec, George Loewenstein — 1997
• On the psychophysical law.Pascale Bourgain, Stephani de Borbone — 1957
• Some variables influencing the rate of gain of information.Robert W. Brainard, Thomas S. Irby, Paul M. Fitts — 1962
• Incorrigibility as the Mark of the MentalRichard Rorty — 1970
• Judgment and decision making, J. Frank Yates. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, Prentice-Hall inc. 1990Colin F. Camerer — 1991
• Experts in uncertaintyTheodore Modis — 1993
• Ulysses and the Sirens: Studies in Rationality and IrrationalityJon Elster — 1985
• The nature of decisions in gambling: Equivalence of single and compound subjective probabilitiesJohn Cohen, C. E. M. Hansel — 1957
• Languages and Designs for Probability JudgmentGlenn Shafer, Amos Tversky — 1990
• Stimmung als InformationNorbert Schwarz — 1987
• Insensitivity to the Value of Human Life: A Study of Psychophysical NumbingDavid Fetherstonhaugh, Paul Slovic, Stephen Johnson — 1997
• Need to Know: Analytical and Psychological CriteriaBaruch Fischhoff — 2000
• Risk assessment: Evaluating error in subjective estimatesBaruch Fischhoff, Chris Whipple — 1981
• Human judgment and social policyKenneth R. Hammond — 1980
• The Covariance Decomposition of the Probability Score and Its Use in Evaluating Prognostic EstimatesHal R. Arkes, N V Dawson, Theodore Speroff — 1995

Cited by

• The fluency effect as the underlying variable for judging beauty and usabilityDeniece S. Nazareth — 2014
• Individual Determinants of Inventor Productivity: Report and Preliminary Results with Evidence from Linked Human Capital and Patent DataKatharina Frosch, Dietmar Harhoff, Karin Hoisl — 2015
• La théorie argumentative du raisonnementHugo Mercier — 2009
• A perspective on judgment and choice: mapping bounded rationality.Daniel Kahneman — 2003
• How smart do you need to be to get it wrong? The role of cognitive capacity in the development of heuristic-based judgment.Herminio de la Red Vega — 2008
• Linda is not a bearded lady: configural weighting and adding as the cause of extension errors.José Luis Campal Fernández — 2009
• Inmigrazioari buruzko diskurtso heuristikoaren azterketaSantiago Palacios, Blanca Olalde — 2011
• Hypothesis Testing and Ambiguity AversionPietro Ortoleva — 2014
• The Parietal Cortex in Sensemaking: The Dissociation of Multiple Types of Spatial InformationMercè Gil Viñas, Ma Àngels Selles Pons, Montserrat Caselles — 2013
• The source of the truth bias: Heuristic processing?Annathasya — 2015
• Stress and Decision Making: Effects on Valuation, Learning, and Risk-taking道子 籏, 裕子 西村, 直美 嶋田 — 2017
• Individual Tariffs for Mobile Service Bundles - A Negotiation Calculation ToolL. Pau, Hong Chen — 2006
• Sign-dependent Value of Time in Stated Preference: Judgment Bias or Exposure of Genuine Preference?E.J. Van de Kaa — 2010
• HUMAN JUDGMENT AND DECISION MAKING - 88-703Carey K. Morewedge — 2009
• An Affect Primary Framework for Privacy Decision MakingEaswar A. Nyshadham, Gerald Van Loon — 2014
• Managing innovation successfully: The value of contextual fit (Doctoral Dissertation)Ronald Bledow — 2010
• Autonomous e-coaching in the wild: empirical validation of a model-based reasoning systemBart A. Kamphorst, Michel Klein, Arlette van Wissen — 2014
• Alheios ao risco: influências das falhas de julgamento dos empreendedores na avaliação de oportunidadesRubens Mussolin Massa — 2015
• Belief learning and revision studied with information integration theoryAnne Schlottmann, Norman H. Anderson — 2007
• When 1 in 200 is higher than 5 in 1000: the "1 in X effect" on the perceived probability of having a Down syndrome-affected childElisa Barilli — 2010

Related papers

No related papers recorded.