Blameworthiness in Games with Imperfect Information
Explore this paper's citation graph
Summary
The main technical result of the paper is a sound and complete bimodal logic that describes the interplay between knowledge and blameworthiness in strategic games with imperfect information.
- Type
- preprint
- Published
- 2018-11-05
- Cited by
- 2
- References
- 46
- Access
- Open access
- OpenAlex
- https://openalex.org/W2900431508
- Semantic Scholar
- https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:53230318
Keywords
Imperfect, Perfect information, Outcome (game theory), Computer science, Strategic dominance
References
- A Logic for Coalitions with Bounded Resources
- Coalitions in Action Logic
- Responsibility and Control: A Theory of Moral Responsibility
- Deconstructing intent to reconstruct morality
- Agency and Deontic Logic
- Logic for social software
- Reasoning about uncertainty
- Moral Responsibility and Alternative Possibilities: Essays on the Importance of Alternative Possibilities
- A New Look at the Semantics and Optimization Methods of CP-Networks
- Constructive knowledge: what agents can achieve under imperfect information
- Reasoning about action and cooperation
- Axioms for Deliberative Stit
- Seeing To it That: A Canonical Form for Agentives
- Reasoning about Knowledge and Strategies: Epistemic Strategy Logic
- What groups do, can do, and know they can do: an analysis in normal modal logics
- On the logic of cooperation and propositional control
- Moral ignorance and blameworthiness
- The deliberative stit: A study of action, omission, ability, and obligation
- A Modal Logic for Coalitional Power in Games
- Moral Responsibility and Determinism: The Cognitive Science of Folk Intuitions