The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for Assessing the Quality of Nonrandomised Studies in Meta-Analyses
Explore this paper's citation graph
Summary
The goal of this project is to develop an instrument providing an easy and convenient tool for quality assessment of nonrandomised studies to be used in a systematic review.
- Type
- article
- Published
- 2014-01-01
- Cited by
- 26,649
- References
- 0
- Access
- Open access
- OpenAlex
- https://openalex.org/W2612891587
- Semantic Scholar
- https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:79550924
Keywords
Quality (philosophy), Comparability, Scale (ratio), Task (project management), Psychology
References
No references recorded for this paper.
Cited by
- Basal Cell Carcinoma in The Netherlands
- A systematic review of early versus delayed wound closure in patients with open fractures requiring flap coverage
- Testing the reliability and efficiency of the pilot Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT) for systematic mixed studies review.
- Associations between interleukin‐6 gene −174 C/G and −572 C/G polymorphisms and the risk of gastric cancer: A meta‐analysis
- The role of peripheral inflammatory markers in dementia and Alzheimer's disease: a meta-analysis.
- Association between KRAS codon 13 mutations and clinical response to anti-EGFR treatment in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: results from a meta-analysis
- Acid‐suppressive therapy is associated with spontaneous bacterial peritonitis in cirrhotic patients: A meta‐analysis
- Community-associated Clostridium difficile infection and antibiotics: a meta-analysis.
- Malaria and soil-transmitted intestinal helminth co-infection and its effect on anemia: a meta-analysis.
- Low circulating adiponectin levels in women with polycystic ovary syndrome: an updated meta-analysis
- The relation between cigarette smoking and risk of acute myeloid leukemia: An updated meta‐analysis of epidemiological studies
- Serum and Tissue Zinc in Epithelial Malignancies: A Meta-Analysis
- Indirect costs in patients with coronary artery disease and mental disorders: A systematic review and meta-analysis
- Tilted versus axially placed dental implants: a meta-analysis.
- Clinicopathological and Prognostic Significance of CD24 Overexpression in Patients with Gastric Cancer: A Meta-Analysis
- Effectiveness and safety of the posterior approach with soft tissue repair for primary total hip arthroplasty: a meta-analysis.
- Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor-C Expression as a Biomarker of Poor Prognosis in Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Meta-Analysis
- Prevalence of Clostridium difficile Infection among Solid Organ Transplant Recipients: A Meta-Analysis of Published Studies
- Clinical prediction of incident heart failure risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis
- Preoperative C-reactive protein as a prognostic predictor for upper tract urothelial carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Related papers
- Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions, Version 5.1.0. The Cochrane Collaboration
- GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations
- Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement
- Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test
- Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement
- Statistical aspects of the analysis of data from retrospective studies of disease.
- Methods for trend estimation from summarized dose-response data, with applications to meta-analysis.
- The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration
- Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta‐analysis