The Shared Socioeconomic Pathways and their energy, land use, and greenhouse gas emissions implications: An overview

Keywords

Greenhouse gas, Baseline (sea), Climate change, Land use, Natural resource economics

References

• Extending the Shared Socioeconomic Pathways for sub-national impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability studiesSyeda Mariya Absar, Benjamin L. Preston — 2015
• Long-term economic growth projections in the Shared Socioeconomic PathwaysRob Dellink, Jean Château, Elisa Lanzi — 2017
• 2020 emissions levels required to limit warming to below 2 °CJoeri Rogelj, David McCollum, Brian C. O’Neill — 2013
• Energy system transformations for limiting end-of-century warming to below 1.5 °CJoeri Rogelj, Gunnar Luderer, Robert Pietzcker — 2015
• Ensemble flood risk assessment in Europe under high end climate scenariosLorenzo Alfieri, Luc Feyen, Francesco Dottori — 2015
• A new scenario framework for climate change research: the concept of shared climate policy assumptionsElmar Kriegler, Jae Edmonds, Stéphane Hallegatte — 2014
• A new scenario framework for climate change research: the concept of shared socioeconomic pathwaysBrian C. O’Neill, Elmar Kriegler, Keywan Riahi — 2014
• The Need for and Use of Socio-Economic Scenarios for Climate Change AnalysisElmar Kriegler, Brian C. O’Neill, Stéphane Hallegatte — 2012
• A proposal for a new scenario framework to support research and assessment in different climate research communitiesDetlef P. van Vuuren, Keywan Riahi, Richard H. Moss — 2012
• A new scenario framework for Climate Change Research: scenario matrix architectureDetlef P. van Vuuren, Elmar Kriegler, Brian C. O’Neill — 2014
• Regional, national, and spatially explicit scenarios of demographic and economic change based on SRES. Technol Forecast Soc ChangArnulf Grübler, Brian C. O’Neill, Keywan Riahi — 2007
• The human core of the shared socioeconomic pathways: Population scenarios by age, sex and level of education for all countries to 2100Samir KC, Wolfgang Lutz — 2017
• The role of technology for achieving climate policy objectives: overview of the EMF 27 study on global technology and climate policy strategiesElmar Kriegler, John P. Weyant, Geoffrey J. Blanford — 2014
• The representative concentration pathways: an overviewDetlef P. van Vuuren, Jae Edmonds, Mikiko Kainuma — 2011
• Why do global long‐term scenarios for agriculture differ? An overview of the AgMIP Global Economic Model IntercomparisonMartin von Lampe, Dirk Willenbockel, Helal Ahammad — 2014
• The roads ahead: Narratives for shared socioeconomic pathways describing world futures in the 21st centuryBrian C. O’Neill, Elmar Kriegler, Kristie L. Ebi — 2017
• Climate and socio-economic scenarios for climate change research and assessment: reconciling the new with the oldDetlef P. van Vuuren, Timothy R. Carter — 2014
• Future growth patterns of world regions – A GDP scenario approachMarian Leimbach, Elmar Kriegler, Niklas Roming — 2017
• Economic mitigation challenges: how further delay closes the door for achieving climate targetsGunnar Luderer, Robert Pietzcker, Christoph Bertram — 2013
• Emulating coupled atmosphere-ocean and carbon cycle models with a simpler model, MAGICC6 - Part 1: Model description and calibrationMalte Meinshausen, S. C. B. Raper, T. M. L. Wigley — 2011

Cited by

• CMIP5 Scientific Gaps and Recommendations for CMIP6Ronald J. Stouffer, Veronika Eyring, Gerald Meehl — 2017
• The environmental Kuznets curve after 25 yearsDavid I. Stern — 2017
• Climate Damage on Production or on Growth: What Impact on the Social Cost of Carbon?Céline Guivarch, Antonin Pottier — 2018
• Global Energy Demand in a Warming ClimateEnrica De Cian, Ian Sue Wing, De Cian, Enrica — 2016
• The Vulnerability, Impacts, Adaptation, and Climate Services (VIACS) Advisory Board for CMIP6Alex C. Ruane, Claas Teichmann, Nigell Arnell — 2016
• The Scenario Model Intercomparison Project (ScenarioMIP) for CMIP6Brian C. O’Neill, Claudia Tebaldi, Detlef P. van Vuuren — 2016
• Will economic growth and fossil fuel scarcity help or hinder climate stabilization?Elmar Kriegler, Ioanna Mouratiadou, Gunnar Luderer — 2016
• Introduction to the RoSE special issue on the impact of economic growth and fossil fuel availability on climate protectionElmar Kriegler, Ioanna Mouratiadou, Gunnar Luderer — 2016
• The SSP4: A world of deepening inequalityKatherine Calvin, Ben Bond‐Lamberty, Leon Clarke — 2017
• Mind the gap – the case for medium level emission scenariosBas van Ruijven — 2016
• Energy, land-use and greenhouse gas emissions trajectories under a green growth paradigmDetlef P. van Vuuren, Elke Stehfest, David Gernaat — 2017
• The marker quantification of the Shared Socioeconomic Pathway 2: A middle-of-the-road scenario for the 21st centuryOliver Fricko, Peter Havlík, Joeri Rogelj — 2017
• Multi-model assessment of global hydropower and cooling water discharge potential under climate changeMichelle T. H. van Vliet, Rens van Beek, Stephanie Eisner — 2016
• Impacts of climate mitigation strategies in the energy sector on global land use and carbon balanceKerstin Engström, Mats Lindeskog, Stefan Olin — 2016
• Fossil-fueled development (SSP5): An energy and resource intensive scenario for the 21st centuryElmar Kriegler, Nico Bauer, Alexander Popp — 2017
• Future air pollution in the Shared Socio-economic PathwaysShilpa Rao, Zbigniew Klimont, Steven J. Smith — 2017
• Shared Socio-Economic Pathways of the Energy Sector – Quantifying the NarrativesNico Bauer, Katherine Calvin, Johannes Emmerling — 2017
• Projections of industrial water withdrawal under shared socioeconomic pathways and climate mitigation scenariosShinichiro Fujimori, Naota Hanasaki, Toshihiko Masui — 2016
• The Vulnerability, Impacts, Adaptation and Climate Services Advisory Board (VIACS AB V1.0) Contribution to CMIP6Alex C. Ruane, Claas Teichmann, Nigel W. Arnell — 2016
• Global anthropogenic emissions of particulate matter including black carbonZbigniew Klimont, Kaarle Kupiainen, C. Heyes — 2016

Related papers

• GHG Mitigation Potentials and Costs from Land-Use, Land-Use Change and Forestry (LULUCF) in Annex 1 CountriesHannes Böttcher, Kazuto Aoki, Stéphane de Cara — 2008
• Annex I countries and land use, land use change and forestry (LULUCF).Zainab Hassan, Vijay Rawat — 2009
• FROM LAND-USE, LAND-USE CHANGE AND FORESTRY (LULUCF) GHG MITIGATION POTENTIALS AND COSTS FROM LAND-USE, LAND-USE CHANGE AND FORESTRY (LULUCF) IN ANNEX I COUNTRIESHannes Böttcher, Kentaro Aoki, Stéphane de Cara — 2008
• Meta-studies in land use science: Current coverage and prospectsJasper van Vliet, Nicholas R. Magliocca, Bianka Büchner — 2015
• Review on Several Domestic Land Use Change ModelsYunlong Cai — 2005
• Establishing sustainable GHG inventory systems in African countries for Agriculture and Land Use, Land-use Change and Forestry (LULUCF)T. C. Wirth, Tiffany G. Troxler — 2015
• land use, land-use change and forestry (LULUCF)R. Quentin Grafton, Harry W. Nelson, N. Ross Lambie — 2012
• Land Use, Land-Use Change and Forestry 매트릭스 작성을 위한 공간정보 특성 고찰황진후, 장래익, 전성우 — 2018