Comparing Pre Commit Reviews and Post Commit Reviews Using Process Simulation

Keywords

Commit, Computer science, Process (computing), Context (archaeology), Task (project management)

References

• Harnessing software development contexts to inform software process selection decisionsSimona Jeners, Rory V. O’Connor, Clake, Paul — 2013
• The situational factors that affect the software development process: Towards a comprehensive reference frameworkPaul Clarke, Rory V. O’Connor — 2012
• Verification and validation of simulation modelsJ.P.C. Kleijnen — 1995
• Using design of experiments, sensitivity analysis, and hybrid simulation to evaluate changes to a software development process: a case studyWayne Wakeland, Robert H. Martin, David Raffo — 2004
• On the understanding of programs with continuous code reviewsMario Bernhart, Thomas Grechenig — 2013
• Supporting Decision-Making in Software Engineering with Process Simulation and Empirical StudiesIoana Rus, Michael Halling, Stefan Biffl — 2003
• A Consolidated Process for Software Process Simulation: State of the Art and Industry ExperienceNauman bin Ali, Kai Petersen — 2012
• Managing the Sources of Uncertainty: Matching Process and Context in Software DevelopmentAlan MacCormack, Roberto Verganti — 2003
• Modeling and simulation of open source development using an agile practiceIvana Turnu, Marco Melis, Alessandra Cau — 2006
• On credibility of simulation studies of telecommunication networksKrzysztof Pawlikowski, H.-D.J. Jeong, J.-S.R. Lee — 2002
• Evaluating the effectiveness of process improvements on software development cycle time via system dynamics modellingJ.D. Tvedt, J.S. Gollofello — 1995
• A systematic literature review on the industrial use of software process simulationNauman bin Ali, Kai Petersen, Claes Wohlin — 2014
• Getting the Best out of Software Process Simulation and Empirical Research in Software EngineeringPaul Wernick, Tracy Hall — 2007
• An exploratory study of the pull-based software development modelGeorgios Gousios, Martin Pinzger, Arie van Deursen — 2014
• Simulation Modeling and AnalysisMark J. Schervish, Averill M. Law, W. David Kelton — 1982
• What Types of Defects Are Really Discovered in Code Reviews?Mika Mäntylä, Casper Lassenius — 2009
• Convergent contemporary software peer review practicesPeter C. Rigby, Christian Bird — 2013
• Using empirical knowledge from replicated experiments for software process simulation: a practical exampleJürgen Münch, Ove Armbrust — 2003
• Design and Code Inspections to Reduce Errors in Program DevelopmentMichael Fagan — 1976
• Evaluating the impact of test-first programming and pair programming through software process simulationMarco Melis, Ivana Turnu, Alessandra Cau — 2006

Cited by

• A Faceted Classification Scheme for Change-Based Industrial Code Review ProcessesTobias Baum, Olga Liskin, Kai Niklas — 2016
• Summary of the International Conference on Software and System Processes (ICSSP 2016): [Co-located with ICSE 2016]Marco Kuhrmann, Rory V. O’Connor, Dewayne E. Perry — 2016
• ICSSP 2016 – Special Issue IntroductionMarco Kuhrmann, Rory V. O’Connor, Dewayne E. Perry — 2017
• Agile practices and the promotion of entrepreneurial skills in software developmentCristiano Tolfo, Raul Sidnei Wazlawick, Marcelo Gitirana Gomes Ferreira — 2018
• Automated processing and gathering of data provided by the continuous integration of Nokia’s 5G uplaneSami Väntti — 2018
• Modern code reviews - Preliminary results of a systematic mapping studyDeepika Badampudi, Ricardo Britto, Michael Unterkalmsteiner — 2019
• Code Reviews for Visual Programming LanguagesGiuliano Giorgio Ragusa — 2018
• Cognitive-support code review tools: improved efficiency of change-based code review by guiding and assisting reviewersTobias Baum — 2019
• Individual, Social and Personnel Factors Influencing Modern Code Review ProcessNargis Fatima, Sumaira Nazir, Suriayati Chuprat — 2019
• Situational Factors for Modern Code Review to Support Software Engineers’ SustainabilitySumaira Nazir, Nargis Fatima, Suriayati Chuprat — 2020
• Knowledge Sharing Factors for Modern Code Review to Minimize Software Engineering WasteNargis Fatima, Sumaira Nazir, Suriayati Chuprat — 2020
• Modern Code Review Benefits-Primary Findings of A Systematic Literature ReviewSumaira Nazir, Nargis Fatima, Suriayati Chuprat — 2020
• Software Engineering Wastes - A Perspective of Modern Code ReviewNargis Fatima, Sumaira Nazir, Suriayati Chuprat — 2020
• Situational factors affecting Software Engineers Sustainability: A Vision of Modern Code ReviewSumaira Nazir, Nargis Fatima, Suriayati Chuprat — 2019
• Does Project Associated Situational Factors have Impact on Sustainability of Modern Code Review Workforce?Sumaira Nazir, Nargis Fatima, Suriayati Chuprat — 2019
• Constructing a Hybrid Software Process Simulation Model in Practice: An Exemplar from IndustryYue Li, He Zhang, Liming Dong — 2020
• An exploratory study on confusion in code reviewsFelipe Ebert, Fernando Castor, Nicole Novielli — 2020
• A Systematic Literature Review and Taxonomy of Modern Code ReviewNicole Davila, Ingrid Nunes — 2021
• Can we benchmark Code Review studies? A systematic mapping study of methodology, dataset, and metricDong Wang, Yuki Ueda, Raula Gaikovina Kula — 2021
• Assessing the Risk of Software Development in Agile Methodologies Using SimulationMaria Ilaria Lunesu, Roberto Tonelli, Lodovica Marchesi — 2021

Related papers

• Improving the Quality of Commit Messages in Students’ ProjectsIris Ma, Cristina Videira Lopes — 2023
• If in Doubt, Try Three: Developing Better Version Control Commit Behaviour with First Year StudentsAmanda Berg, Simon Osnes, Richard Glassey — 2022
• The Spatial Aspects of CrimeYves Zénou — 2003
• The Spatial Aspects of CrimeYves Zénou — 2003
• Do time of day and developer experience affect commit bugginess?Jon Eyolfson, Lin Tan, Patrick Lam — 2011
• The Relationship between Commit Message Detail and Defect Proneness in Java Projects on GitHubJacob G. Barnett, Charles K. Gathuru, Luke S. Soldano — 2016