Cost-effectiveness Analysis of Cefepime and Ceftazidime in Treatment of Bacterial Infections
Explore this paper's citation graph
Summary
Cefepime is better than ceftazidime in the treatment of bacterial infections in regard to their cost effectiveness, and the pharmaceutical economics strategy was employed for the cost effectiveness analysis.
- Type
- article
- Published
- 2001-01-01
- Cited by
- 0
- References
- 0
- OpenAlex
- https://openalex.org/W2376400102
- Semantic Scholar
- https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:56808045
Keywords
Cefepime, Ceftazidime, Medicine, Dose, Intensive care medicine
References
No references recorded for this paper.
Cited by
No citing papers recorded for this paper.
Related papers
- A Cost-effect Analysis of Cefepime and Ceftazidime in the Treatment of Respiratory Tract Infections
- Comparative study of the efficacy of Cefepime and Ceftazidime in treating serious lower respiratory tract infections
- Evaluation of clinical therapeutic effect of cefepime in treating lower repiratory tract infections
- A randomized controlled clinical study of cefepime versus ceftazidime in the treatment of 129 patients with bacterial infections
- Cefepime versus ceftazidime for the treatment of serious bacterial infections.
- Cefepime versus ceftazidime in the treatment of lower respiratory tract infections.
- A meta-analysis of the treatment of lower respiratory tract infection with randomized control study of Cefepime and Ceftazidime
- Clinical evaluation of cefepime in treatment of lower respiratory tract bacterial infections
- A randomized trial of cefepime and ceftazidime for the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia.
- Phase IV trials of cefepime in treat-ment of various moderate or severe bacterial infections