A Comment on The Spring and Autumn Annals and Zuo Zhuan
Explore this paper's citation graph
- Type
- article
- Published
- 2004-01-01
- Cited by
- 0
- References
- 0
- OpenAlex
- https://openalex.org/W2357685401
- Semantic Scholar
- https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:148089947
Keywords
Annals, Spring (device), Criticism, Spring and Autumn period, Classics
References
No references recorded for this paper.
Cited by
No citing papers recorded for this paper.
Related papers
- The Fact of Confucius' Original Version of Zuo Zhuan Is Undeniable: Re-disprove of Mr. NIU Hong-en's Disprove
- The Book of History and the Gongyang School on The Spring and Autumn Annals
- Study on lost articles of Shi Jie’s Dissertation on The Annals of Spring and Autumn
- The Spring and Autumn Annals and "Yi":An Inquiry into the Cultural Origin and Connotation of "Yi"
- On Su Shi's Spring and Autumn Annals
- The Basic Attitude of Wang Kaiyun towards the Spring and Autumn Scholarship
- Idealist Specialty of "Notes to the Spring and Autumn Annals" by Gao Kang
- Within the Tension of "Meaning" and "Thing":A Study of the Opinions of Zhuang Chunyu and Kong Guangsen on The Spring and Autumn Annals
- The Reflection on the Relationships between Records of History and Chunqiu Annals
- Did the Unveiled Historical Recording Conceal Nothing?—Question on the Truth of Dong Hu's Case