Biophysical and economic limits to negative CO2 emissions

Keywords

Environmental science, Greenhouse gas, Limiting, Software deployment, Climate change

References

• Direct Air Capture of CO2 with Chemicals: A Technology Assessment for the APS Panel on Public AffairsRobert H. Socolow, Michael Desmond, Roger D. Aines — 2011
• Use of U.S. Croplands for Biofuels Increases Greenhouse Gases Through Emissions from Land-Use ChangeTimothy D. Searchinger, Ralph E. Heimlich, R. A. Houghton — 2008
• The Impact of Climate Change and Bioenergy on NutritionBrian Thompson, Cohen, Marc J — 2012
• BECCS capability of dedicated bioenergy crops under a future land‐use scenario targeting net negative carbon emissionsEtsushi Kato, Yoshiki Yamagata — 2014
• Geoengineering potential of artificially enhanced silicate weathering of olivinePeter Köhler, Jens Hartmann, Dieter Wolf‐Gladrow — 2010
• Using Attributional Life Cycle Assessment to Estimate Climate‐Change Mitigation Benefits Misleads Policy MakersRichard J. Plevin, Mark A. Delucchi, Felix Creutzig — 2014
• Offset of the potential carbon sink from boreal forestation by decreases in surface albedoRichard Betts — 2000
• What is the potential for biogas digesters to improve soil fertility and crop production in Sub-Saharan Africa?Jo Smith, Assefa Abegaz, Robin Matthews — 2014
• Human Appropriation of Renewable Fresh WaterSandra Postel, Gretchen C. Daily, Paul R. Ehrlich — 1996
• Trade-offs of different land and bioenergy policies on the path to achieving climate targetsKatherine Calvin, Marshall Wise, Page Kyle — 2014
• Simulated impacts of afforestation in East China monsoon region as modulated by ocean variabilityDi Ma, Michael Notaro, Zhengyu Liu — 2013
• Limited potential of no-till agriculture for climate change mitigationD. S. Powlson, Clare Stirling, M.L. Jat — 2014
• Getting from here to there – energy technology transformation pathways in the EMF27 scenariosVolker Krey, Gunnar Luderer, Leon Clarke — 2014
• Co‐benefits, trade‐offs, barriers and policies for greenhouse gas mitigation in the agriculture, forestry and other land use (AFOLU) sectorMercedes Bustamante, Carmenza Robledo‐Abad, R.J. Harper — 2014
• Delivering food security without increasing pressure on landPete Smith — 2013
• The role of carbon plantations in mitigating climate change: potentials and costsBart J. Strengers, J.G. van Minnen, B. Eickhout — 2008
• Economic mitigation challenges: how further delay closes the door for achieving climate targetsGunnar Luderer, Robert Pietzcker, Christoph Bertram — 2013
• Sequestering atmospheric carbon dioxide by increasing ocean alkalinityHaroon S. Kheshgi — 1995
• Can radiative forcing be limited to 2.6 Wm−2 without negative emissions from bioenergy AND CO2 capture and storage?Jae Edmonds, Patrick Luckow, Katherine Calvin — 2013
• Paving the way for sustainable bioenergy in Europe: Technological options and research avenues for large-scale biomass feedstock supplyBenoît Gabrielle, Laure Bamière, Natàlia Caldés — 2014

Cited by

• Rightsizing carbon dioxide removalJuan José Pérez-Soba Díez del Corral — 2017
• A prospective clinical, cost and environmental analysis of a clinician‐led virtual urology clinicÁngel Serrano — 2019
• Pathways toward zero-carbon electricity required for climate stabilizationRichard Audoly, Adrien Vogt‐Schilb, Céline Guivarch — 2014
• Greenhouse Gas Emissions: Challenges, Technologies and SolutionsShurpali, Narasinha, Agarwal, Avinash Kumar, Srivastava, Virendra K. 1943- — 2019
• Soil carbon sequestration and biochar as negative emission technologiesPete Smith — 2016
• Bioenergy and the city – What can urban forests contribute?Florian Kraxner, Kentaro Aoki, Georg Kindermann — 2016
• Emissions reduction: Scrutinize CO2 removal methodsPhillip Williamson — 2016
• 1.5 [deg]C and climate research after the Paris AgreementMike Hulme — 2016
• Geosciences after ParisJoeri Rogelj, Reto Knutti — 2016
• Optimal scale of carbon-negative energy facilitiesDaniel L. Sanchez, Duncan S. Callaway — 2016
• 2 °C and SDGs: united they stand, divided they fall?Christoph von Stechow, Jan C. Minx, Keywan Riahi — 2016
• The 'best available science' to inform 1.5 [deg]C policy choicesGlen P. Peters — 2016
• High‐resolution spatial modelling of greenhouse gas emissions from land‐use change to energy crops in the United KingdomMark Richards, Mark Pogson, Marta Dondini — 2017
• Can CCS and NET enable the continued use of fossil carbon fuels after CoP21R. Stuart Haszeldine — 2016
• The cumulative carbon budget and its implicationsRichard Millar, Myles Allen, Joeri Rogelj — 2016
• Advances and Slowdowns in Carbon Capture and Storage Technology DevelopmentAurora D’Aprile, D’Aprile, Aurora — 2016
• Cooperation and discord in global climate policyRobert O. Keohane, David G. Victor — 2016
• Implications of the Paris agreement for the oceanAlexandre Magnan, Michel Colombier, Raphaël Billé — 2016
• El Nino and a record CO2 riseRichard Betts, Chris Jones, Jeff Knight — 2016
• Sustainable forest management and bioenergy expansion : A multi-scale approach from global to localF. Kraxner — 2016

Related papers

• Serving Away from Home: How Deployments Influence ReenlistmentJames Hosek, Mark E. Totten — 2002
• Understanding deployment from the perspective of those who have served.Bonnie Mowinski Jennings, Kristal C. Melvin, Donna L. Belew — 2017
• Research on Accelerating Application Technology of Centralized ERP System Based on HANAHaohai Zhang, Wei Wang, Xinqiao Gu — 2019
• NATIONAL ITS PROGRAM PLAN : SYNOPSISG W Euler, H D Robertson — 1995
• Greenhouse gas emissions increase global warmingHaradhan Kumar Mohajan — 2011
• Evaluating the Impact of Climate Change and Growing Problem of Global Warming: An Empirical InvestigationKamal Kant — 2023