Data from eye-tracking corpora as evidence for theories of syntactic processing complexity.

Keywords

Reading (process), Natural language processing, Eye tracking, Psychology, Artificial intelligence

References

• Parafoveal-on-foveal effects in normal reading.François Chesnais — 2005
• The dependency locality theory: A distance-based theory of linguistic complexity.Edward Gibson — 2000
• Image, language, brain : papers from the First Mind Articulation Project SymposiumAlec Marantz, 保司 宮下, Wayne A. O'Neil — 2000
• Eye guidance in reading and scene perceptionG. Underwood — 1998
• Statistical language modeling using the CMU-cambridge toolkitPhilip Clarkson, Ronald Rosenfeld — 1997
• The integration of syntax and semantic plausibility in a wide-coverage model of human sentence processingUlrike Padó — 2007
• Argument-Head Distance and Processing Complexity: Explaining both Locality and Antilocality EffectsShravan Vasishth, Richard L. Lewis — 2006
• Locality and Parsing ComplexityLars Konieczny — 2000
• Building a Large Annotated Corpus of English: The Penn TreebankMitchell P. Marcus — 1993
• An Information-Theoretic Definition of SimilarityDekang Lin — 1998
• The effects of morphology on the processing of compound words: evidence from naming, lexical decisions and eye fixations.Barbara J. Juhasz, Matthew S. Starr, Albrecht W. Inhoff — 2003
• The Contributions of Verb Bias and Plausibility to the Comprehension of Temporarily Ambiguous SentencesSusan M. Garnsey, Neal J. Pearlmutter, Elizabeth Myers — 1997
• Reading processes during syntactic analysis and reanalysisFernanda Ferreira, John M. Henderson — 1993
• Low-level predictive inference in reading: the influence of transitional probabilities on eye movements.Scott A. McDonald, Richard Shillcock — 2003
• Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research.Keith Rayner — 1998
• Explorations in CognitionElizabeth F. Loftus, Donald A. Norman, David E. Rumelhart — 1975
• Ambiguity Resolution in Sentence Processing: Evidence against Frequency-Based AccountsMartin J. Pickering, Matthew J. Traxler, Matthew W. Crocker — 2000
• Individual differences in syntactic processing: The role of working memoryJonathan King, Marcel Adam Just — 1991
• Mixed-Effects Models in S and S-PlusVincent J. Carey, You‐Gan Wang — 2001
• Book Reviews: Head-driven Phrase Structure Grammar and German in Head-driven Phrase-structure GrammarIvan A. Sag, Carl Pollard — 1996

Cited by

• Computational Models of Eye Movements in Reading : A Data-Driven Approach to the Eye-Mind LinkMattias Nilsson — 2012
• Time-Varying Effects on Eye Movements during ReadingMattias Nilsson, Joakim Nivre — 2012
• Uncertainty Reduction as a Measure of Cognitive Processing EffortStefan L. Frank — 2010
• Lexical surprisal as a general predictor of reading timeIrene Fernández Monsalve, Stefan L. Frank, Gabriella Vigliocco — 2012
• The Architecture of Cognition: Rethinking Fodor and Pylyshyn's Systematicity ChallengeP. Calvo, J. Symons — 2014
• Correcting the Incorrect: Local Coherence Effects Modeled with Prior Belief UpdateKlinton Bicknell, Roger Lévy, Vera Demberg — 2009
• Communicative efficiency in language production: Optional case-marking in JapaneseChigusa Kurumada, T. Florian Jaeger — 2015
• Rôle du relativiseur dans l'attachement des propositions relatives ambiguës en françaisClaire Delle Luche — 2008
• On Repairing Sentences: An Experimental and Computational Analysis of Recovery from Unexpected Syntactic Disambiguation in Sentence ParsingMatthew James Green — 2013
• Coordinating speech-related eye movements between comprehension and productionHelene Kreysa — 2009
• A connectionist account of the acquisition and processing of relative clausesHartmut Fitz, Franklin Chang, Morten H. Christansen — 2011
• Surprisal-based comparison between a symbolic and a connectionist model of sentence processingStefan L. Frank — 2009
• Human and computer estimations of Predictability of words in written languageBruno Bianchi, Gastón Bengolea Monzón, Luciana Ferrer — 2020
• Eye movements during reading proverbs and regular sentences: the incoming word predictability effectGerardo Fernández, Diego E. Shalóm, Reinhold Kliegl — 2014
• Better Surface Realization through PsycholinguisticsRajakrishnan Rajkumar, Michael White — 2014
• Vectorial representations of meaning for a computational model of language comprehensionWilliam Schuler, Stephen Wu — 2010
• Imaging neural correlates of syntactic complexity in a naturalistic contextAsaf Bachrach — 2008
• Regression-based estimation of ERP waveforms: I. The rERP frameworkNathaniel J. Smith, Marta Kutas — 2014
• The effect of word position on eye-movements in sentence and paragraph readingVictor Kuperman, Michael Dambacher, Antje Nuthmann — 2010
• Minimal Dependency Length in Realization RankingMichael White, Rajakrishnan Rajkumar — 2012

Related papers

• Summary of Studies on Structure of "X+Tou"Fan Yu-jing — 2008
• A Study of the Complement System in TCSLJing‐Rong Li — 2006
• Discussion of Research Teaching Methods from Binary System Complement Teaching CaseJiang Shu-yanb — 2012
• Dezhou Dialect Complement UsageCao Yan-jie — 2005
• A STUDY ON THE ACQUISITION OF POSSIBILITY COMPLEMENT BY THAI STUDENTSLan Qiu — 2011
• Moving From Paper to E-Book ReadingJoan Vinall-Cox — 2012
• An Algorithm for Complements of Finite Sets of IntegersGerald D. Weinstein — 1976
• Ways of Not Reading Gertrude SteinNatalia Cecire — 2015
• On the Reading Features of Mao Zedong and Zeng GuofanFengxia Zhang — 2011