Reported Methodologic Quality and Discrepancies between Large and Small Randomized Trials in Meta-Analyses
Explore this paper's citation graph
Summary
The potential association between reported methodologic quality and intervention effects was studied to assess whether methodologicquality may explain discrepancies between the results of large and small randomized trials in meta-analyses.
- Type
- article
- Published
- 2001-12-04
- Cited by
- 2,064
- References
- 31
- OpenAlex
- https://openalex.org/W2117294447
- Semantic Scholar
- https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:25895393
Keywords
Jadad scale, Blinding, Randomized controlled trial, Medicine, Odds ratio
References
- Bias in location and selection of studies.
- Overview of randomized trials of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors on mortality and morbidity in patients with heart failure. Collaborative Group on ACE Inhibitor Trials.
- Effect of beta-blockade on mortality in patients with heart failure: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.
- Risperidone versus typical antipsychotic medication for schizophrenia.
- Collection devices for obtaining cervical cytology samples.
- Randomized clinical trials in Hepatology: Predictors of quality
- Prostaglandins for prelabour rupture of membranes at or near term.
- Pharmacotherapy for hypertension in the elderly
- A quality assessment of randomized control trials of primary treatment of breast cancer.
- Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement.
- Large trials vs meta-analysis of smaller trials: how do their results compare?
- Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: is blinding necessary?
- Methodology and overt and hidden bias in reports of 196 double-blind trials of nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs in rheumatoid arthritis.
- Cardiac rupture, mortality and the timing of thrombolytic therapy: a meta-analysis.
- Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials.
- Issues in comparisons between meta-analyses and large trials.
- Assessing the quality of randomized controlled trials: an annotated bibliography of scales and checklists.
- Predictive ability of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials.
- The hazards of scoring the quality of clinical trials for meta-analysis.
- Balneotherapy and quality assessment: interobserver reliability of the Maastricht criteria list and the need for blinded quality assessment.
Cited by
- Research Corner Advantages and Limitations of Systematic Reviews in Physical Therapy
- Evidence based evaluation of immuno-coagulatory interventions in critical care.
- Meta-analysis of parenteral nutrition versus enteral nutrition in patients with acute pancreatitis
- Inhaled nitric oxide for preterm infants--who benefits?
- Do glucocorticoids decrease mortality in acute respiratory distress syndrome? A meta‐analysis
- Treatment of deep caries lesions in adults: randomized clinical trials comparing stepwise vs. direct complete excavation, and direct pulp capping vs. partial pulpotomy.
- Surviving a site audit: tips for good clinical practice in an implant trial.
- A comparison of peginterferon α-2a and α-2b for treatment-naive patients with chronic hepatitis C virus: A meta-analysis of randomized trials.
- Lack of efficacy of neuromuscular electrical stimulation of the lower limbs in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients: A meta‐analysis
- The efficacy and safety of panitumumab in the treatment of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis from five randomized controlled trials
- Effects of yoga in adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus: A meta‐analysis
- Minimally Invasive Plating Osteosynthesis in the Treatment of Humeral Shaft Fractures: A Meta-Analysis
- The efficacy of myo-inositol supplementation to prevent gestational diabetes onset: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
- Effects of Cannabinoid Administration for Pain: A Meta-Analysis and Meta-Regression
- Endoscopic band ligation versus pharmacological therapy for variceal bleeding in cirrhosis: a meta-analysis.
- Use of the Internet for the delivery and evaluation of interventions aimed at reducing alcohol consumption
- Is noninvasive pressure support ventilation as effective and safe as continuous positive airway pressure in cardiogenic pulmonary oedema?
- Estimation and adjustment of bias in randomized evidence by using mixed treatment comparison meta‐analysis
- Efficacy and safety of first‐line chemotherapy plus bevacizumab in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: a meta‐analysis
- Is the SMART approach better than other treatment approaches for prevention of asthma exacerbations? A meta-analysis.
Related papers
- Quality Assessment of Randomized Controlled Trials in the Journal of the Korean Academy of Family Medicine
- Assessing the quality of randomized trials: reliability of the Jadad scale.
- Quality Assessment of Randomized Controlled Trials Published in the Korean Journal of Urology Over the Past 20 Years
- Practical aspects of randomization and blinding in randomized clinical trials.
- An observational study found that authors of randomized controlled trials frequently use concealment of randomization and blinding, despite the failure to report these methods.
- 전립선에 대한 무작위 대조군 연구 질평가
- Blinding and Randomization.