Research misconduct and data fraud in clinical trials: prevalence and causal factors
Explore this paper's citation graph
Summary
It seems clear that the view of misconduct as being simply the result of aberrant or self-delusional personalities likely underestimates the effect of other important factors and inhibits the development of effective prevention strategies.
- Type
- review
- Published
- 2016-02-01
- Cited by
- 69
- References
- 47
- OpenAlex
- https://openalex.org/W2097562102
- Semantic Scholar
- https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:39122795
Keywords
Scientific misconduct, Misconduct, Harm, Medicine, Clinical trial
References
- Research Misconduct and Crime Lessons from Criminal Science on Preventing Misconduct and Promoting Integrity
- The analysis of 168 randomised controlled trials to test data integrity
- Ethical Problems in Academic Research
- A case for a duty to feed the hungry: GM plants and the third world
- Fraud and deceit in medical research
- The role of biostatistics in the prevention, detection and treatment of fraud in clinical trials.
- Repairing research integrity
- Deriving chemosensitivity from cell lines: Forensic bioinformatics and reproducible research in high-throughput biology
- Causal Factors Implicated in Research Misconduct: Evidence from ORI Case Files
- A pilot study of biomedical trainees' perceptions concerning research ethics
- In the trenches, doubts about scientific integrity.
- Randomized response: a survey technique for eliminating evasive answer bias.
- Development of Two Measures of Climate for Scientific Organizations
- Reported data on granisetron and postoperative nausea and vomiting by Fujii et al. Are incredibly nice!
- Exploring Scientific Misconduct: Isolated Individuals, Impure Institutions, or an Inevitable Idiom of Modern Science?
- Misconduct in research: An issue of science policy and practice
- Preventing scientific misconduct.
- High-dose chemotherapy for high-risk primary breast cancer: an on-site review of the Bezwoda study.
- A successful system of scientific data audits for clinical trials. A report from the Cancer and Leukemia Group B.
- Academic Economists Behaving Badly? A Survey on Three Areas of Unethical Behavior
Cited by
- Fraud in clinical trials: complex problem, simple solutions?
- The Value of Trainee Networks in Pediatric Surgical Research
- Problematic trial detection in ClinicalTrials.gov
- Research misconduct and data fraud in clinical trials
- Prevalence of data fraud
- Assessment and classification of protocol deviations
- Legal and ethical issues in research
- A computationally simple central monitoring procedure, effectively applied to empirical trial data with known fraud.
- Compliance with research standards within gynecologic oncology fellowship: A Gynecologic Oncology Fellowship Research Network (GOFRN) study.
- Qualitative features in clinical trials: coordinates for prevention of passive and active misconduct
- Reported causal factors for research misconducts in Iranian research
- Associations between attitudes towards scientific misconduct and self-reported behavior
- Factors associated with scientific misconduct and questionable research practices in health professions education
- Criminalization of scientific misconduct
- An analysis of retractions of dental publications.
- Researcher Requests for Inappropriate Analysis and Reporting: A U.S. Survey of Consulting Biostatisticians
- A slight glance at peer review
- Industry funding effect on positive results of probiotic use in the management of acute diarrhea: a systematized review
- Best practices in nutrition science to earn and keep the public's trust.
- The perceived causes of research misconduct among faculty members in the natural, social, and applied sciences
Related papers
- Scientific misconduct. Panel urges new approach to inquiries.
- Improving the scientific misconduct hearing process.
- Occurrence of Research Misconduct and Institutional Capacity to Prevent and Manage Research Misconduct-Perspectives from Kenyan Research Regulators
- How Should Journal Editors Respond to Cases of Suspected Misconduct?
- The Demographics of Deception: What Motivates Authors Who Engage in Misconduct?