Process evaluation of complex interventions: Medical Research Council guidance
Explore this paper's citation graph
Summary
New MRC guidance provides a framework for conducting and reporting process evaluation studies that will help improve the quality of decision-making in the design and testing of complex interventions.
- Type
- article
- Published
- 2015-03-19
- Cited by
- 5,205
- References
- 124
- Access
- Open access
- OpenAlex
- https://openalex.org/W2085001923
- Semantic Scholar
- https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:10833812
Keywords
Psychological intervention, Process (computing), Computer science, Data science, Process management
References
- ロジックモデル策定ガイド = Logic model development guide
- Theory of planned behaviour cognitions do not predict self-reported or objective physical activity levels or change in the ProActive trial.
- The ProActivetrial protocol – a randomised controlled trial of the efficacy of a family-based, domiciliary intervention programme to increase physical activity among individuals at high risk of diabetes [ISRCTN61323766]
- Contextualizing and assessing the social capital of seniors in congregate housing residences: study design and methods
- Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research
- Initiating change locally in bullying and aggression through the school environment (INCLUSIVE): a pilot randomised controlled trial.
- Process evaluation: the new miracle ingredient in public health research?
- Who will increase their physical activity? Predictors of change in objectively measured physical activity over 12 months in the ProActive cohort
- Guidelines for Reporting Reliability and Agreement Studies (GRRAS) were proposed.
- The quality of care. How can it be assessed?
- The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations.
- Exercise Evaluation Randomised Trial (EXERT): a randomised trial comparing GP referral for leisure centre-based exercise, community-based walking and advice only.
- A critical realist approach to understanding and evaluating heart health programmes
- Assessment of generalisability in trials of health interventions: suggested framework and systematic review
- A new theory of health promoting schools based on human functioning, school organisation and pedagogic practice.
- Program integrity in primary and early secondary prevention: are implementation effects out of control?
- Facilitating adherence to physical activity: exercise professionals' experiences of the National Exercise Referral Scheme in Wales. a qualitative study
- Process Evaluation for Public Health Interventions and Research
- Use of qualitative methods alongside randomised controlled trials of complex healthcare interventions: methodological study
- Fidelity of delivery of a physical activity intervention: Predictors and consequences
Cited by
- Evidence-based practices in pressure ulcer prevention: Lost in implementation?
- Research on public health interventions: the need for a partnership with practitioners.
- A multimedia campaign to improve back beliefs in patients with non-specific low back pain: a process evaluation
- Patient Characteristics Associated With a Successful Response to Nurse‐Led Care Programs Targeting the Oldest‐Old: A Comparison of Two RCTs
- Improving quality and safety in nursing homes and home care: the study protocol of a mixed-methods research design to implement a leadership intervention
- Nurse-led medicines’ monitoring in care homes study protocol: a process evaluation of the impact and sustainability of the adverse drug reaction (ADRe) profile for mental health medicines
- Effectiveness of interventions targeting antibiotic use in long-term aged care facilities: a systematic review and meta-analysis
- Adapting IAPT services to support frontline NHS staff during the Covid-19 pandemic: the Homerton Covid Psychological Support (HCPS) pathway
- Development of a tool for identifying and addressing prioritised determinants of quality improvement initiatives led by healthcare professionals: a mixed-methods study
- Process evaluation of a knowledge translation intervention using facilitation of local stakeholder groups to improve neonatal survival in the Quang Ninh province, Vietnam
- Cross-age tutoring in kindergarten and elementary school settings: A systematic review and meta-analysis
- Minimal, negligible and negligent interventions.
- On the development, evaluation and evolution of health behaviour theory
- Tailoring Healthy Workplace Interventions to Local Healthcare Settings: A Complexity Theory-Informed Workplace of Well-Being Framework
- Interventions to reduce ambient particulate matter air pollution and their effect on health
- Myths and realities of training in obstetric emergencies.
- Information provision for people with multiple sclerosis.
- Implementing health promotion programmes in schools: a realist systematic review of research and experience in the United Kingdom
- Implementation of a multicomponent intervention to prevent physical restraints in nursing home residents (IMPRINT): study protocol for a cluster-randomised controlled trial
- Predictors of cessation in smokers suspected of TB: Secondary analysis of data from a cluster randomized controlled trial.
Related papers
- PATTERN OF THERAPEUTIC INTERVENTIONS MADE BY CLINICAL PHARMACIST IN A SOUTH INDIAN HOSPITAL
- What's the difference? Using descriptors to classify the care provided to children and adolescents with behavioral and emotional problems
- Physical activity interventions in Hispanic American girls and women
- Multilevel interventions: study design and analysis issues.
- Interventions to combat and prevent cyberbullying
- International school‐based interventions for preventing obesity in children
- TO THE QUESTION OF THE ROLE AND SIGNIFICANCE OF CONTROLLING IN THE PROCESS OF IMPLEMENTING THE PROGRAMS OF STRATEGIC DEVELOPMENT OF MUNICIPALITY
- Effectiveness of the Lessons Learned Process in ESA OPS Directorate
- Process Management System by KPI Towards Challenging and Evolving Organizations
- C. D. orientation to evaluation: Systems‐process model for program evaluators