Improving comprehension of jury instructions with audio-visual presentation

Keywords

Comprehension, Recall, Psychology, Jury instructions, Presentation (obstetrics)

References

• A power primer.Jacob Cohen — 1992

Cited by

• Debunking Misconceptions: Do Jury Instructions Influence Comprehension and Verdict SelectionAryssa Z. Washington — 2012
• Deconstructing the Simplification of Jury Instructions: How Simplifying the Features of Complexity Affects Jurors’ Application of InstructionsAlexander A. Fisher, Micael W Davis — 2017
• The Impact of Jury Instruction Formatting and Insanity Defense Consistency on Juror Knowledge and Decision-MakingElaine Tsao — 2015
• Utformning av träningsbroschyr för patienter med digitalnervskadorAlexandra Englund, Emma Jonasson — 2014
• Provided notes as an alternative to juror notetaking : the effects of deliberation & trial complexityEL Kelly — 2010
• Practices, Policies and Procedures that Influence Juror Satisfaction in AustraliaJane Goodman‐Delahunty, Neil Brewer, Jonathan Clough — 2014
• The Effects of a Custom-Designed Animation Program on Learning Chinese Characters.Lin Shi — 2012
• Directing jurors in England and Wales : the effect of narrativisation on comprehensionSally Nelson — 2013
• Investigating Miranda waiver decisions: An examination of the rational consequences.Hayley L. Blackwood, Richard Rogers, Jennifer A. Steadham — 2015
• ‘Telling tales’: exploring narratives of life and law within the (mock) jury roomLouise Ellison, Vanessa E. Munro — 2015
• Assisting jurors: Promoting recall of trial information through the use of a trial-ordered notebookLorraine Hope, Naomi Eales, Arta Mirashi — 2014
• Beyond Plain Language: A Learner-Centered Approach to Pattern Jury InstructionsKatherine Miles, Jacquline L. Cottle — 2010
• Objective and Subjective Comprehension of Jury Instructions in Criminal TrialsBlake M. McKimmie, Emma Antrobus, Chantelle Baguley — 2014
• Spherical Photography and Virtual Tours for Presenting Crime Scenes and Forensic Evidence in New Zealand CourtroomsNicole D. Tung, Jason Barr, Dion Sheppard — 2015
• Elder research: filling an important gap in psychology and law.Eve M. Brank — 2007
• Do People Comprehend Legal Language in WillsEdith Greene, Kethera Fogler, Sheri C. Gibson — 2012
• Effects of language fluency and graphic animation on modality choices by adults when following online explanatory demonstrationsPeter Wright, Anthony Soroka, S. Belt — 2009
• The effect of auditory stimulation on learners with different learning stylesMcCarter, Kimberly M. — 2008
• Reducing racial bias in the penalty phase of capital trials.Netta Shaked‐Schroer, Mark Costanzo, Amy Marcus‐Newhall — 2008
• A Demonstrative Helps Opposing Expert Testimony Sensitize Jurors to the Validity of Scientific EvidenceAngela M. Jones, Margaret Bull Kovera — 2015

Related papers

• Bringing Jury Instructions Into the Twenty-First CenturyNancy S. Marder — 2006
• Editor's Summary and Q&A: Informed consent recall and comprehension in orthodontics: Traditional vs improved readability and processability methodsEdith Y. Kang, Henry W. Fields, Asuman Kiyak — 2009
• Informed consent recall and comprehension in orthodontics: traditional vs improved readability and processability methods.Edith Y. Kang, Henry W. Fields, Asuman Kiyak — 2009
• Precious little guidance: Jury instruction on damage awards.Edith Greene, Brian H. Bornstein — 2000
• US pattern jury instructions: problems and proposalsBethany K. Dumas — 2000
• Death penalty instructions to jurors : still not comprehensible after all these yearsGail Stygall — 2017
• Friendly Limiting InstructionsAnnie Soo Yeon Ahn — 2018