Design techniques for stated preference methods in health economics.

Keywords

Optimal design, Prior probability, Preference, Mathematical optimization, Design of experiments

References

• The Oil Pollution Act of 1990Paul S. Edelman — 1990
• Do Hypothetical and Actual Marginal Willingness to Pay Differ in Choice Experiments?: Application to the Valuation of the EnvironmentFredrik Carlsson, Peter Martinsson — 2001
• Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behaviorDaniel McFadden — 1972
• The Disutility of Time Spent on the United Kingdom's National Health Service Waiting ListsCarol Propper — 1995
• Evaluating Health Risks: An Economic ApproachPer‐Olov Johansson — 1995
• Optimal Experimental Design for Double-Bounded Dichotomous Choice Contingent ValuationBarbara Kanninen — 1993
• Establishing Patient Preferences for Blood Transfusion Support: An Application of Conjoint AnalysisMarjon van der Pol, John Cairns — 1998
• Optimal Designs for Discrete Choice Contingent Valuation Surveys: Single-Bound, Double-Bound, and Bivariate ModelsAnna Alberini — 1995
• Willingness to pay for improved respiratory and cardiovascular health: a multiple-format, stated-preference approach.F. Reed Johnson, Melissa Ruby Banzhaf, William H. Desvousges — 2000
• The Importance of Utility Balance in Efficient Choice DesignsJoel Huber, Klaus Zwerina — 1996
• Estimating time preferences for health using discrete choice experiments.Marjon van der Pol, John Cairns — 2001
• Analyzing Decision Making: Metric Conjoint AnalysisDick R. Wittink, Jordan J. Louviere — 1988
• The feasibility of additive conjoint measurement in measuring utilities in breast cancer patientsC. Verhoef, Arne Maas, Lukas J.A. Stalpers — 1991
• Design of Sequential Experiments for Contingent Valuation StudiesBarbara Kanninen — 1993
• Optimal Design for Multinomial Choice ExperimentsBarbara Kanninen — 2002
• Agency in health care. Examining patients' preferences for attributes of the doctor-patient relationship.Sandra Vick, Anthony Scott — 1998
• Using conjoint analysis to assess women's preferences for miscarriage management.Mandy Ryan, J Hughes — 1997
• Efficient Experimental Design with Marketing Research ApplicationsWarren F. Kuhfeld, Randall D. Tobias, Mark J. Garratt — 1994
• Efficient Experimental Design with Marketing Research ApplicationsWarren F. Kuhfeld, R D Tobias, Mark Garratt — 1994
• A General Method for Constructing Efficient Choice DesignsKlaus Zwerina, Joel Huber, W. Kuhfeld — 1996

Cited by

• Environmental valuation, ecosystem services and aquatic speciesMitesh Kataria — 2007
• Justice distributive : opinions, jugements et choix individuels.Romina Boarini — 2004
• Validity and feasibility of best worst scaling using multiple treatment outcomes of Parkinson's diseaseTina Tin Wan Leung — 2013
• Why Junior Doctors Don’t Want to Become General Practitioners: A Discrete Choice Experiment from the MABEL Longitudinal Study of DoctorsPeter Sivey, Anthony Scott, Julia Witt — 2010
• Demand for Pharmaceutical Drugs: A Choice Modelling ExperimentAnna Merino — 2003
• Estimating the willingness to pay for a reliable electricity supply in the Turkish Republic of Northern CyprusAygul Ozbafli — 2012
• Efficient Designs for Alternative Specific Choice ExperimentsMichiel C.J. Bliemer, John M. Rose — 2005
• Constructing efficient choice experimentsJohn M. Rose, Michiel C.J. Bliemer — 2005
• Evaluating the Costs and Benefits of Tidal Range Energy GenerationTara Hooper — 2014
• Donor selection for patients undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: Assessment of the priorities of Canadian hematopoietic stem cell transplant physiciansJ. Tay — 2009
• Development of a time-dependent hurricane evacuation model for the New Orleans area : research project capsule.Chester G. Wilmot, Ravindra Gudishala — 2008
• The implications of respondent information processing rules on preference revelation in stated choice experimentsDavid A. Hensher — 2005
• Selective developments in choice analysis and a reminder about the dimensionality of behavioural analysisDavid A. Hensher, John M. Rose, Sean Puckett — 2007
• Revealing Differences in Willingness to Pay due to the Dimensionality of Stated Choice Designs: An Initial AssessmentDavid A. Hensher — 2006
• Optimal design of stated preference experiments when using mixed logit modelsAlejandro Tudela, G Rebolledo — 2006
• Managed Lane Travelers—Do They Pay for Travel As They Claimed They Would?Mark Burris, Prem Chand Devarasetty, W. Douglass Shaw — 2011
• The implications on willingness to pay of respondents ignoring specific attributesDavid A. Hensher, John M. Rose, William H. Greene — 2004
• HOW DO RESPONDENTS HANDLE STATED CHOICE EXPERIMENTS? INFORMATION PROCESSING STRATEGIES UNDER VARYING INFORMATION LOADDavid A. Hensher — 2004
• A comparison of algorithms for generating efficient choice experiments.Wu Quan, John M. Rose, Andrew T. Collins — 2011
• How good is good? Exploring frontiers of experimental design efficiencyT Longworth — 2007

Related papers

• The Bayesian-Laplacian BrainSemir Zeki, Oliver Y. Chén — 2017
• Reference Priors Versus Reverse Reference Priors: The Role of InvarianceReschenhofer, Erhard — 2000
• I-Optimal Design of Mixture ExperimentsPeter Goos, Bradley Jones, Utami Dyah Syafitri — 2016
• A-optimal versus D-optimal design of screening experimentsBradley Jones, Katherine Allen-Moyer, Peter Goos — 2020
• I-optimal mixture designsPeter Goos, Bradley Jones, Utami Dyah Syafitri — 2013
• Towards a better Estimation of the Parameters of Linear Regression Models: The Optimal Designed Experiment ApproachOlusoga Akin Fasoranbaku, G O Daramola — 2018
• PCA Combined Model-Based Design of Experiments (DOE) Criteria for Differential and Algebraic System Parameter EstimationYang Zhang, Thomas F. Edgar — 2008
• Optimal experiment design for cardinal values estimation: guidelines for data collection.Kristel Bernaerts, K.P.M. Gysemans, T NHANMINH — 2005
• An R-Shiny application to calculate optimal designs for single substance and interaction trials in dose response experiments.Tim Holland‐Letz, Annette Kopp‐Schneider — 2020