Systematic Review: Enhancing the Use and Quality of Colorectal Cancer Screening
Explore this paper's citation graph
Summary
Although CRC screening is underused overall, important problems of overuse and misuse also exist and system- and policy-level interventions that target vulnerable populations are needed to reduce underuse.
- Type
- review
- Published
- 2010-05-18
- Cited by
- 285
- References
- 128
- Access
- Open access
- OpenAlex
- https://openalex.org/W2011583128
- Semantic Scholar
- https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:11662605
Keywords
Medicine, Family medicine, Psychological intervention, MEDLINE, Guideline
References
- Colorectal cancer screening among African American church members: A qualitative and quantitative study of patient-provider communication
- Colorectal Cancer Screening among Men And Women in The United States
- Timing of repeat colonoscopy: disparity between guidelines and endoscopists' recommendation.
- Colorectal Cancer Screening among Users of County Health Centers and Users of Private Physician Practices
- Health plan policies and programs for colorectal cancer screening: a national profile.
- Beliefs, Risk Perceptions, and Gaps in Knowledge as Barriers to Colorectal Cancer Screening in Older Adults
- A population‐based study of colorectal cancer test use
- Socioeconomic and racial/ethnic differences in the discussion of cancer screening: "between-" versus "within-" physician differences.
- Colorectal Cancer Screening by Primary Care Physicians
- Enhancing the use and quality of colorectal cancer screening.
- Persistent Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Up‐to‐Date Colorectal Cancer Testing in Medicare Enrollees
- A Randomized Controlled Trial to Increase Cancer Screening Among Attendees of Community Health Centers
- Predictors of colorectal screening in rural Colorado: testing to prevent colon cancer in the high plains research network.
- Racial and ethnic disparities in cancer screening the importance of foreign birth as a barrier to care
- Colorectal cancer screening participation: comparisons with mammography and prostate-specific antigen screening.
- Physicians encouraging colorectal screening: a randomized controlled trial of enhanced office and patient management on compliance with colorectal cancer screening.
- Patient-physician colorectal cancer screening discussions and screening use.
- Colorectal Cancer Test Use from the 2005 National Health Interview Survey
- Factors associated with colon cancer screening: the role of patient factors and physician counseling.
- Healthcare system factors and colorectal cancer screening.
Cited by
- Systems of Support to Increase Colorectal Cancer Screening and Follow-up Rates (SOS): design, challenges, and baseline characteristics of trial participants
- Organized colorectal cancer screening in integrated health care systems.
- Prostate-specific antigen surveillance among men with clinically localized prostate cancer who do not receive initial treatment.
- Effectiveness of Community Health Workers in Providing Outreach and Education for Colorectal Cancer Screening in Appalachian Kentucky
- Interpretation of CT colonographic images: should we rely on nonradiologists?
- Colorectal cancer screening for average‐risk adults: 2018 guideline update from the American Cancer Society
- Trends in colonoscopy and fecal occult blood test use after the introduction of dual screening offers in Germany: Results from a large population-based study, 2003-2016.
- Multilevel predictors of colorectal cancer screening use in California
- A multimodal intervention to promote mammography and colorectal cancer screening in a safety-net practice.
- Continuity of Care and Colorectal Cancer Screening by Vietnamese American Patients
- The Impact of Colorectal Cancer Screening in a Veteran Hospital Population
- Barriers to Colorectal Cancer Screening Among Publicly Insured Urban Women: No Knowledge of Tests and No Clinician Recommendation
- Impact of the telephone motivational interviewing on the colorectal cancer screening participation. A randomized controlled study
- Signaling mechanisms of resistance to EGFR- and Anti-Angiogenic Inhibitors cancer.
- Does colorectal cancer risk perception predict screening behavior? A systematic review and meta-analysis
- Characterizing Online Narratives About Colonoscopy Experiences: Comparing Colon Cancer “Screeners” Versus “Survivors”
- Understanding Outstanding: quality assurance in colonoscopy
- Effectiveness of a Web-Based Colorectal Cancer Screening Patient Decision Aid
- Improving the uptake of cardiac rehabilitation in invited patients: a multi-method evaluation
- Impact of a Doctor's Invitation on Participation in Colorectal Cancer Screening: A Cluster Randomized Trial.
Related papers
- Time from Positive Screening Fecal Occult Blood Test to Colonoscopy and Risk of Neoplasia
- Challenges in the Management of Positive Fecal Occult Blood Tests
- Gastroenterologists’ Practice Patterns for Positive Fecal Occult Blood Test
- Use of Colonoscopy for Polyp Surveillance in Medicare Beneficiaries
- Fecal Occult Blood Test, Is it still worth for Colorectal Cancer Screening?
- Colonoscopic Yield after Positive Fecal Occult Blood Testing: 566
- Esophago-gastro-duodenoscopy is not indicated in patients with positive immunochemical test and nonexplanatory colonoscopy
- Reasons For Lack of Follow‐up Colonoscopy Among Persons With A Positive Fecal Occult Blood Test Result: A Qualitative Study
- Colonoscopy vs. Fecal Immunochemical Test in Reducing Mortality From Colorectal Cancer (CONFIRM): Rationale for Study Design