Assessing Stated Preferences for Colorectal Cancer Screening: A Critical Systematic Review of Discrete Choice Experiments

Keywords

Checklist, Population, Medicine, Conjoint analysis, Cancer screening

References

• A Review of Studies Examining Stated Preferences for Cancer ScreeningKathryn A. Phillips, Stephanie Van Bebber, Deborah A. Marshall — 2006
• The STARD statement for reporting studies of diagnostic accuracy: explanation and elaboration.Patrick M. Bossuyt, Johannes B. Reitsma, David E Bruns — 2003
• Responses to procedural information about colorectal cancer screening using faecal occult blood testing: the role of consideration of future consequencesChristian von Wagner, Anna Good, Samuel G. Smith — 2012
• Conjoint Analysis Applications in Health — How are Studies being Designed and Reported?Deborah A. Marshall, John F. P. Bridges, Brett Hauber — 2010
• Preferences for Colorectal Cancer Screening Among Racially/Ethnically Diverse Primary Care PatientsSarah T. Hawley, Robert J. Volk, Partha Krishnamurthy — 2008
• Evidence‐based consumer choice: a case study in colorectal cancer screeningGlenn Salkeld, Michael J. Solomon, Leonie Short — 2003
• Does attribute framing in discrete choice experiments influence willingness to pay? Results from a discrete choice experiment in screening for colorectal cancer.Kirsten Howard, Glenn Salkeld — 2009
• A decision aid to support informed choices about bowel cancer screening among adults with low education: randomised controlled trialSian K. Smith, Lyndal Trevena, Judy M. Simpson — 2010
• Measuring Preferences for Colorectal Cancer ScreeningDeborah A. Marshall, S. Elizabeth McGregor, Gillian Currie — 2010
• Results of screening, rescreening, and follow-up in a prospective randomized study for detection of colorectal cancer by fecal occult blood testing. Results for 68,308 subjects.J Kewenter, Hans Brevinge, Boel Engarås — 1994
• Preference for Colonoscopy Versus Computerized Tomographic Colonography: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Observational StudiesOtto S. Lin, Richard A. Kozarek, Michael Glück — 2012
• How do physician assessments of patient preferences for colorectal cancer screening tests differ from actual preferences? A comparison in Canada and the United States using a stated-choice surveyDeborah A. Marshall, F. Reed Johnson, Nathalie A. Kulin — 2009
• Comparing 3 Values Clarification Methods for Colorectal Cancer Screening Decision-Making: A Randomized Trial in the US and AustraliaAlison T. Brenner, Kirsten Howard, Carmen L. Lewis — 2014
• The veil of experience: do consumers prefer what they know best?Glenn Salkeld, Mandy Ryan, Leonie Short — 2000
• Demographic, social cognitive and social ecological predictors of intention and participation in screening for colorectal cancerTess Gregory, Carlene Wilson, Amy Duncan — 2011
• An empirical comparison of methods for analyzing correlated data from a discrete choice survey to elicit patient preference for colorectal cancer screeningJi Cheng, Eleanor Pullenayegum, Deborah A. Marshall — 2012
• Eliciting Population Preferences for Mass Colorectal Cancer Screening OrganizationMaximilien Nayaradou, Célia Berchi, Olivier Dejardin — 2010
• Participation in colorectal cancer screening trials after first-time invitation: a systematic reviewCarolina Khalid-de Bakker, Daisy Jonkers, Kim M. Smits — 2011
• Worldwide Variations in Colorectal CancerAhmedin Jemal, Robert A. Smith, Elizabeth Ward — 2009
• Clarifying values: an updated reviewAngela Fagerlin, Michael Pignone, Purva Abhyankar — 2013

Cited by

• Older adults’ preferences for colorectal cancer-screening test attributes and test choiceTrisha M. Crutchfield, Christine E. Kistler, Thomas Hess — 2015
• WHAT IS THE ROLE OF COMMUNITY PREFERENCE INFORMATION IN HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT DECISION MAKING? A CASE STUDY OF COLORECTAL CANCER SCREENINGSally Wortley, Kathy Flitcroft, Kirsten Howard — 2015
• Using a discrete choice experiment to inform the design of programs to promote colon cancer screening for vulnerable populations in North CarolinaMichael Pignone, Trisha M. Crutchfield, Paul Brown — 2014
• Colorectal cancer screening in the familial risk population: Is colonoscopy still the strategy of choice?Antonio Z. Gimeno‐García, Noemi Hernández-Álvarez-de-Buylla, David Nicolás–Pérez — 2016
• What matters to patients? A systematic review of preferences for medication-associated outcomes in mental disordersØystein Eiring, Brynjar Landmark, Aas E — 2015
• Synchronous Colorectal Neoplasias: A Single Hospital StudyDalal Nemenqani — 2015
• A Framework for Instrument Development of a Choice Experiment: An Application to Type 2 DiabetesEllen M. Janssen, Jodi B Segal, John F. P. Bridges — 2016
• Implementation of Community-based Education to Promote Colorectal Cancer Knowledge and Screening RatesMarsha Woodall — 2016
• Forty-two systematic reviews generated 23 items for assessing the risk of bias in values and preferences' studies.Juan José Yepes-Núñez, Yuan Zhang, Feng Xie — 2017
• Public Preferences for Lung Cancer Screening Policies.Henk Broekhuizen, Karin Groothuis‐Oudshoorn, Rozemarijn Vliegenthart — 2017
• Applying stated-preference methods to improve health systems in sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic reviewLauren E. Brown, Ting-Hsuan Lee, Manuela De Allegri — 2017
• Methods to perform systematic reviews of patient preferences: a literature surveyTsung Yu, Nomin Enkhamgalan, Ganchimeg Zorigt — 2017
• Colorectal Cancer: A collaborative approach to improve education and screening in a rural populationMarsha Woodall, Mary DeLetter — 2018
• Good health checks according to the general public; expectations and criteria: a focus group studyYrrah H. Stol, Eva C. A. Asscher, Maartje Schermer — 2018
• The impact of sample type and procedural attributes on relative acceptability of different colorectal cancer screening regimensJoanne M. Osborne, Ingrid Flight, Carlene Wilson — 2018
• A choice experiment to identify the most important elements of a successful cancer screening program according to those who research and manage such programsJennifer Priaulx, Marcell Csanádi, Harry J. de Koning — 2018
• Eliciting vulnerable patients’ preferences regarding colorectal cancer screening: a systematic reviewSamuel Lee, Meghan C. O’Leary, Karl Umble — 2018
• Assessing Lung Cancer Screening Programs under Uncertainty in a Heterogeneous Population.Henk Broekhuizen, Karin Groothuis‐Oudshoorn, Rozemarijn Vliegenthart — 2018
• Preferences for Surveillance of Barrett’s Oesophagus: a Discrete Choice ExperimentNorma B. Bulamu, Gang Chen, Tim Bright — 2018
• APPLYING STATED-PREFERENCE METHODS TO HEALTH SYSTEMS PROBLEMS IN SUB-SAHARAN AFRICALauren Brown — 2018

Related papers

• The Effect of an Electronic Checklist on Critical Care Provider Workload, Errors, and PerformanceCharat Thongprayoon, Andrew M. Harrison, John C. O’Horo — 2016
• Assessing computer systems against 21 CFR Part 11: developing a checklistAngela Carter, Mary L. Clark — 2002
• [Successful trial for introduction of the WHO surgical safety checklist].Akibumi Omi, Yukako Terai, Daisuke Muro — 2014
• Implementation of surgical safety checklist in Mukalla hospitals; YemenDr Maha Bin Dahman, Prof.Dr.Nawal Banafa, Prof\Fahmi Aram — 2018
• Dataset on utilization of a clinical checklist in the surgical operation in a resource limited settingsAyele Semachew, Sahileslassie Afewerk, Nebyat Embiale — 2018
• A checklist of mammals of NepalSanjan Thapa — 2014
• WHO safe surgery checklist: Barriers to universal acceptanceDivya Jain, Ridhima Sharma, Seran Reddy — 2018
• A Collaborative Checklist for E-Journal AccessRocki Strader, Alison C. Roth, Bob Boissy — 2006