Cisgenics as emerging bio-objects: bio-objectification and bio-identification in agrobiotech innovation

Keywords

Objectification, Identification (biology), Organism, Object (grammar), Genetically modified organism

References

• Cisgenics - Facilitating the second green revolution in India by improved traditional plant breedingEric D. Jacobsen, Karaba N. Nataraja — 2008
• Taking European Knowledge Society SeriouslyUlrike Felt — 2009
• GM Crops & Food: Biotechnology in Agriculture and the Food ChainDrew L. Kershen — 2014
• Scientific opinion addressing the safety assessment of plants developed through cisgenesis and intragenesisEFSA Panel on Genetically Modified Organisms (GMO) — 2012
• The roles of rhetoric in the public understanding of scienceAlan G. Gross — 1994
• Cisgenic plants are similar to traditionally bred plantsHenk J. Schouten, Frans A. Krens, E. Jacobsen — 2006
• Bio-objects and the bio-objectification processTora Holmberg, Nete Schwennesen, Andrew Webster — 2011
• Intragenesis and cisgenesis as alternatives to transgenic crop development.Inger Holme, Toni Wendt, Preben Bach Holm — 2013
• Consumer perception of risk associated with eating genetically engineered soybeans is less in the presence of a perceived consumer benefit.Jayne Brown, Yanchao Ping — 2003
• What do civil society organisations expect from participation in science? Lessons from Germany and Spain on the issue of GMOsMaria Paola Ferretti, Vincenzo Pavone — 2009
• Global health social technologies: reflections on evolving theories and landscapesJoanna Chataway, Rebecca Hanlin, Julius Mugwagwa — 2010
• Bio-objects’ political capacity: a research agendaPieter Maeseele, Kim Hendrickx, Vincenzo Pavone — 2013
• Science, safety, and trust: the case of transgenic foodL. Martinelli, Małgorzata Karbarz, Helena Siipi — 2013
• Distortion, confusion, and impasses: could a public dialogue within Knowledge Landscapes contribute to better communication and understanding of innovative knowledge?Anna Lydia Svalastog, Joachim Allgaier, Lucia Martinelli — 2014
• From risk assessment to in-context trajectory evaluation - GMOs and their social implicationsVincenzo Pavone, Joanna Goven, Riccardo Guarino — 2011
• Renegotiating GM crop regulationJennifer Kuzma, Adam Kokotovich — 2011
• Multiple aspects of unnaturalness: are cisgenic crops perceived as being more natural and more acceptable than transgenic crops?Henrik Mielby, Peter Sandøe, Jesper Lassen — 2013
• Efficient octopine Ti plasmid-derived vectors for Agrobacterium- mediated gene transfer to plantsR. Deblaere, Benny Bytebier, Henri De Greve — 1985
• Do cisgenic plants warrant less stringent oversight?Henk J. Schouten, Frans A. Krens, E. Jacobsen — 2006
• Deliberation on GMOs: A Study of How a Citizens’ Jury Affects the Citizens’ AttitudesMarianne Aasen, Arild Vatn — 2013

Cited by

• Stakeholder views on issues to consider when assessing the sustainability of genetically modified potatoFrøydis Gillund, Anne Ingeborg Myhr, Audrun Utskarpen — 2016
• Is it only the regulatory status? Broadening the debate on cisgenic plantsLilian van Hove, Frøydis Gillund — 2017
• Is biotechnology (more) acceptable when it enables a reduction in phytosanitary treatments? A European comparison of the acceptability of transgenesis and cisgenesisDamien Rousselière, Samira Rousselière — 2017
• Demand for pesticide-free, cisgenic food? Exploring differences between consumers of organic and conventional foodAnna Kristina Edenbrandt — 2018
• Commercialization of the gene-edited crop and morality: challenges from the liberal patent law and the strict GMO law in the EULi Jiang — 2020
• Transgenia, cisgenia e intragenia: diferenças e implicações para a biossegurança.M. J. V. Vasconcelos, A. A. Carneiro, J. E. F. Figueiredo — 2019
• Powering life through MitoTechnologies: exploring the bio-objectification of mitochondria in reproductionNolwenn Bühler, Cathy Herbrand — 2020
• Face Masks During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Simple Protection Tool With Many MeaningsLucia Martinelli, Vanja Kopilaš, Matjaž Vidmar — 2021
• Consumer Movements Confronted by Naturalness in Gene Editing in JapanYoshiki Otsuka — 2021
• Examining the Social and Ethical Issues Raised by Possible Cultivation of Genetically Modified Potato with Late Blight Resistance in NorwayK. Millar, Audrun Utskarpen, A. Myhr — 2015
• Transgenic Food: Uncertainty, Trust, and ResponsibilityL. Martinelli, M. Karbarz, V. Pavone — 2016
• Cisgenesis A Sustainable Approach of Gene Introgression and Its Utilization in Horticultural Crops: A ReviewVaibhav Singh, S. Singh, K. Shikha — 2018

Related papers

• Airline deregulation in Canada and its economic effectsTae Hoon Oum, W. T. Stanbury, M W Tretheway — 1991
• REPORT OF JOINT CONFERENCE ENO FOUNDATION BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND BOARD OF CONSULTANTS, OCTOBER 17 AND 18, 1984, PART I: TRANSPORTATION IN THE ERA OF DEREGULATIONRex H. Wilson, M A Brenner, J O Leet — 1985
• DEREGULATION: THE PRINCIPAL INCONCLUSIVE ARGUMENTS -super-1Warren J. Samuels, James D. Shaffer — 1982
• Deregulation as an Instrument in Industrial PolicyGary D. Libecap — 1986
• Deregulation in the Financial System of the SEACEN CountriesGanesh P. Adhikary — 1989
• Suggestions for Perfect Long-term Mechanism of Risk Communication of Agricultural Genetically Modified Organism in ChinaLv K — 2013
• Legislation of Genetically Modified Organisms Safety:Value Philosophy,Value Orientation and Value PursuitJinpei Zhou — 2012
• Investigation of the Genetically Modified Organism (GMO) Existence in Baby Foods on the Market in TurkeyErdem Artuvan, Salih Aksay — 2021
• A Study on Controversial Causes and It's Countermeasures of the Genetically Modified OrganismLiu Jia-shun — 2004