Two philosophies of science: A study in contrasts

Abraham S. Luchins, Edith H. Luchins · Synthese · 2004

Explore this paper's citation graph

Type: article
Published: 2004-01-01
Cited by: 1
References: 1
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00484859
OpenAlex: https://openalex.org/W1976008837
Semantic Scholar: https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:46984885

Keywords

Philosophy of science, Philosophy of language, Metaphysics, Epistemology, Philosophy

References

Philosophy of ScienceR. G. A. Dolby — 1970

Cited by

Ordinary language philosophy, explanation, and the historical turn in philosophy of science.Paul Franco — 2021

Related papers

Metaphysical necessity: a skeptical perspectiveGraham Priest — 2018
The difference between epistemic and metaphysical necessityMartin Glazier — 2017
Introduction to ‘Three Theories of Metaphysics’Brian Skyrms — 1989
Carnap’s epistemological critique of metaphysicsDarren Bradley — 2018
Humeanisms: metaphysical and epistemologicalAaron Segal — 2020
Form, species, and predication in AristotleMichael Woods — 1993
On Kant’s Knowledge of Leibniz’ Metaphysics—a Reply to GarberStefan Storrie — 2015
Carnap, Quine, and the humean conditionSean Morris — 2021
The Significance of Semantic RealismAlexander Miller — 2003
El Hegel metafísico de HeideggerJuan Pablo Emanuel Esperón — 2019