Should All Literature Reviews be Systematic?

Keywords

CLARITY, Systematic review, Management science, Inclusion (mineral), Task (project management)

References

• Systematic review of the international literature on the epidemiology of mentally disordered offendersDouglas Badger, JEAN P. NURSTEN, Paul Williams — 1999
• Home-based social support for socially disadvantaged mothers.Ellen Hodnett, Ian Roberts — 1999
• Scoping review of literature on the health and care of mentally disordered offendersAnn Hagell, Susan Dowling — 1999
• Qualitative research in health care: II. A structured review and evaluation of studies.Mary Boulton, Ray Fitzpatrick, Clare Swinburn — 1996
• Best evidence synthesis: an intelligent alternative to meta-analysis.Robert E. Slavin — 1995
• Systematic Review of Nonrandom and Qualitative Research Literature: Exploring and Uncovering an Evidence Base for Health Visiting and Decision MakingBill Lemmer, Rachel Grellier, James M. Steven — 1999
• The provision of secure psychiatric services in Leeds; Paper i. A point prevalence study.John O’Grady, P Courtney, J Cunnane — 1992

Cited by

• A systems thinking approach for modelling supply chain risk propagationAbhijeet Ghadge — 2013
• Social support and quality of life in adults with severe and persistent mental illnessGloria Pasmeny — 2008
• Teaching as an evidence informed profession: knowledge mobilisation with a focus on digital technologyRichard Procter — 2014
• Discourses of ability and primary school mathematics : production, reproduction and transformationRachel Marks — 2012
• Exploring industry driven marketing influences on young people who drink alcoholStephanie O’Neil — 2012
• A systematic review of small group communication in post-secondary online coursesNamsook Jahng — 2012
• The Value of “Traditional” Reviews in the Era of Systematic ReviewingMarcel Dijkers — 2009
• Can we overcome the methodological schism? Four models for combining qualitative and quantitative evidenceStephen Gorard — 2002
• A systematic review of cost-effectiveness of monoclonal antibodies for metastatic colorectal cancer.Ansgar Lange, Anne Prenzler, Martin Frank — 2014
• Multi-criteria approaches for urban passenger transport systems: a literature reviewJohanna Camargo Perez, Martha Helena Carrillo, Jairo R. Montoya‐Torres — 2015
• Review: A narrative review of the published ethical debates in palliative care research and an assessment of their adequacy to inform research governanceSue Duke, Helen Bennett — 2010
• A systematic review of the cost-effectiveness of targeted therapies for metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)Ansgar Lange, Anne Prenzler, Martin Frank — 2014
• Researching race/ethnicity and educational inequality in the Netherlands: A critical review of the research literature between 1980 and 2008Peter Stevens, Noël Clycq, Christianne Timmerman — 2011
• Achieving supply chain resilience: the role of procurementCarla Roberta Pereira, Martin Christopher, Andréa Lago da Silva — 2014
• Maternal and child health interventions in Nigeria: a systematic review of published studies from 1990 to 2014Musa Abubakar Kana, Henry V. Doctor, Bárbara Peleteiro — 2015
• Landscape and well-being: a scoping study on the health-promoting impact of outdoor environmentsAndrea Abraham, Kathrin Sommerhalder, Thomas Abel — 2010
• The Role of Causal Models in Evidence-informed Policy Making and PracticeStephen Gorard — 2002
• Head to head: a systematic review of the research evidence on mentoring new head teachersAndrew J. Hobson, Caroline Sharp — 2005
• UNDERSTANDING DECISION-MAKING RELATING TO OUT-OF-AUTHORITY PLACEMENTS FOR PUPILS WITH AUTISTIC SPECTRUM CONDITIONSDaphne Jane Jones — 2012
• Meeting the challenge: developing systematic reviewing in social policyAlison Wallace, Sally Baldwin, Karen Croucher — 2004

Related papers

• DETERMINING QUALITY REQUIREMENTS AT THE UNIVERSITIES TO IMPROVE THE QUALITY OF EDUCATIONNor Hanim Mustafa, Dinmukhamed Kelesbayev, Zh.D. Alibekova — 2018
• Assessing the compliance of systematic review articles published in leading dermatology journals with the PRISMA statement guidelines: A systematic review protocolBuket Gundogan, Alexander J. Fowler, Riaz Agha — 2018
• Outcomes of Digital Biomarker–Based Interventions: Protocol for a Systematic Review of Systematic ReviewsHossein Motahari-Nezhad, Márta Péntek, László Gulàcsi — 2021
• Development of a Systematic Review Protocol and a Scoping Review of Ultrasound-Induced Immune Effects in Peripheral TumorsAnne Rix, Renée Michèle Girbig, Céline Porte — 2021
• Quality of patient-reported and proxy-reported outcomes for children with impairment of the lower extremity: systematic review protocolTim F. F. Saris, J. P. Ruben Kalle, Inger N. Sierevelt — 2022
• Factors in Randomized Controlled Trials Reported to Impact the Implementation of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures Into Routine Care: Protocol for a Systematic ReviewNatasha Roberts, Kimberly Alexander, David Wyld — 2019
• A Guide to Writing a Qualitative Systematic Review Protocol to Enhance Evidence-Based Practice in Nursing and Health Care.Ashleigh E. Butler, Helen Hall, Beverley Copnell — 2016
• Systematic Literature Reviews: An IntroductionGuillaume Lamé — 2019
• Changing the world one systematic review at a time: A new development methodology for making a differenceRuth Stewart — 2014