Understanding pretest and posttest reactions to cognitive ability and personality tests.

Keywords

Psychology, Test (biology), Conscientiousness, Context (archaeology), Personality

References

• Fairness in selection: Current developments and perspectivesRichard D. Arvey, Paul R. Sackett — 1993
• Personnel selection and assessment : individual and organizational perspectivesHeinz Schuler — 1993
• Lisrel 8: Structural Equation Modeling With the Simplis Command LanguageKarl G. Jöreskog, Dag Sörbom — 1993
• Scrutinizing psychological tests: Measurement equivalence and equivalent relations with external variables are the central issuesFritz Drasgow — 1984
• The Perceived Fairness of Selection Systems: An Organizational Justice PerspectiveStephen W. Gilliland — 1993
• Personnel Selection in OrganizationsKevin R. Murphy, Neal Schmitt, Walter C. Borman — 1992
• Applicant reactions to alternative selection proceduresSara L. Rynes, Mary L. Connerley — 1993
• Alternative Ways of Assessing Model FitMichael W. Browne, Robert Cudeck — 1992
• Overall Fit in Covariance Structure Models: Two Types of Sample Size EffectsKenneth A. Bollen — 1990
• Goodness-of-fit indexes in confirmatory factor analysis : The effect of sample sizeHerbert W. Marsh, John Balla, Roderick P. McDonald — 1988
• Effects of procedural and distributive justice on reactions to a selection system.Stephen W. Gilliland — 1994
• Essentials of psychological testingBenjamin Rosner, Lee J. Cronbach — 1949
• Comparative fit indexes in structural models.Peter M. Bentler — 1990
• Goodness of fit in confirmatory factor analysis: The effects of sample size and model parsimonyHerbert W. Marsh, John Balla — 1994
• Study of the measurement bias of two standardized psychological tests.Fritz Drasgow — 1987
• Applied psychology in personnel managementJames A. Breaugh, Wayne F. Cascio — 1978
• Video-based versus paper-and-pencil method of assessment in situational judgment tests: subgroup differences in test performance and face validity perceptions.David Chan, Neal Schmitt — 1997
• THE BIG FIVE PERSONALITY DIMENSIONS AND JOB PERFORMANCE: A META-ANALYSISMurray R. Barrick, Michael K. Mount — 1991
• Racial subgroup differences in predictive validity perceptions on personality and cognitive ability tests.David Chan — 1997
• MOTIVATIONAL COMPONENTS OF TEST TAKINGRichard D. Arvey, William Strickland, Gail Drauden — 1990

Cited by

• Cognitive Ability, Job Knowledge, and Stereotype Threat: When does Adverse Impact Result?Mark V. Palumbo — 2007
• Validatie van een vragenlijst over verwachtingen van sollicitanten 1Bert Schreurs, Eva Derous, Karin Proost — 2009
• ANTECEDENTS AND CONSEQUENCES OF APPLICANT PERCEPTIONS WITHIN AN INTERNET-BASED TESTING CONTEXTLaurie E. Wasko — 2008
• Puzzle Interviews: What Are They and What Do They Measure?Jeremiah Honer, Chris W. Wright, Chris J. Sablynski — 2007
• Der Einfluss von Testmotivation auf die Leistung in einem LeistungstestInes Giermann — 2012
• The Effects of Demographic Variables and Stereotype Threat on Black/White Differences in Cognitive Ability Test PerformancePatrick F. McKay, Dennis Doverspike, Doreen Bowen‐Hilton — 2003
• The Differential Effect of Applicants' Self-Versus Other-Referenced Anxiety on Test PerformanceKarin Proost, Eva Derous, Bert Schreurs — 2011
• Do Immigrants Have Different Procedural Justice Perceptions of Personnel Selection methods? The case of native Israelis and immigrants from the former Soviet UnionYael Brender‐Ilan, Zachary Sheaffer — 2015
• Why Are Manhole Covers Round? A Laboratory Study of Reactions to Puzzle InterviewsChris W. Wright, Chris J. Sablynski, Todd M. Manson — 2012
• The Contributions of Organizational Justice Theory to Combating DiscriminationDirk D. Steiner, Marilena Bertolino — 2006
• Moderating Effects of Achievement Striving and Situational Optimism on the Relationship Between Ability and Performance Outcomes of College StudentsSarath A. Nonis, David W. Wright — 2003
• The Role of Job Relatedness and Self‐efficacy in Applicant Perceptions of Fairness in a High‐stakes Selection SettingLara Zibarras, Fiona Patterson — 2015
• Evaluating candidate reactions to selection practices using organisational justice theoryFiona Patterson, Lara Zibarras, Victoria Carr — 2011
• Responding to the Challenge of a Changing Workforce: Recruiting Nontraditional Demographic GroupsDennis Doverspike, Mary Anne Taylor, Kenneth S. Shultz — 2000
• Personality Types and Applicant Reactions in Real‐Life SelectionLaura Honkaniemi, Taru Feldt, Riitta‐Leena Metsäpelto — 2013
• Does test anxiety induce measurement bias in cognitive ability testsCharlie L. Reeve, Silvia Bonaccio — 2008
• The Role of Attributions and Fairness in Understanding Job Applicant Reactions to Selection Procedures and DecisionsKhaldoun I. Ababneh, Rick D. Hackett, Aaron C. H. Schat — 2014
• In justice we trust: A model of the role of trust in the organization in applicant reactions to the selection processAnthony Celani, Sabrina Deutsch-Salamon, Parbudyal Singh — 2008
• The Effect of Legitimizing Explanations on Applicants’ Perceptions of Selection Assessment Fairness1David M. LaHuis, Norman E. Perreault, Matthew W. Ferguson — 2003
• Racial differences in promotion candidate performance and reactions to selection procedures: a field study in a diverse top‐management contextJ. Bret Becton, Hubert S. Feild, William F. Giles — 2008

Related papers

• Failure of Wiener and Harmon Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI) subtle scales as personality descriptors and as validity indicators.Nathan Charles Weed, Yossef S. Ben‐Porath, James N. Butcher — 1990
• Failure of Wiener and Harmon Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI) subtle scales as personality descriptors and as validity indicators.Nathan Charles Weed, Yossef S. Ben‐Porath, James N. Butcher — 1990
• Supplemental Material for Reliability and Validity of Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-3 (MMPI-3) Scale Scores Among Patients Seeking Spine Surgery2021
• *Aptitude Tests; Cognitive Measurement; *Cognitive Style; Comparative Testing; *Psychometrics; Sex Differences; Standardized Tests; *Test ReliabilityJohnson O’Connor, Descriptors Age Differences — 1988
• A Discussion of Modern Versus Traditional Psychometrics As Applied to Personality Assessment ScalesSteven P. Reise, James M. Henson — 2003
• Psychiatric symptom correlates of the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI) Masculinity-Femininity scale.Leigh C. Ward, Elizabeth A. Dillon — 1990
• Defense of PsychometricsBrian Bolton — 1982
• Effects of Augmenting Response Options on MMPI–2 RC Scale PsychometricsAndrew Cox, Hina Pant, Allison N. Gilson — 2012