In the Opponent's Shoes: Increasing the Behavioral Validity of Attackers’ Judgments in Counterterrorism Models
Explore this paper's citation graph
Summary
The types of assumptions made across various counterterrorism analytical models that represent malicious agents' judgments are analyzed and suggested how some of these assumptions could be modified to describe terrorists' preferences more accurately, by drawing knowledge from the fields of behavioral decision research, politics, philosophy of choice, public choice, and conflict management in terrorism.
- Type
- article
- Published
- 2016-04-01
- Cited by
- 14
- References
- 97
- Access
- Open access
- OpenAlex
- https://openalex.org/W1685864143
- Semantic Scholar
- https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:27888990
Keywords
Computer security, Adversary, Psychology, Computer science, Artificial intelligence
References
- Role of affect in decision making.
- Estimating Terrorism Risk
- Intelligent Adversary Risk Analysis: A Bioterrorism Risk Management Model
- A Value Model for Evaluating Homeland Security Decisions
- Judgment in Managerial Decision Making
- Models of Bounded Rationality: Empirically Grounded Economic Reason
- Decisions with Multiple Objectives
- Hard Targets: Theory and Evidence on Suicide Attacks
- The Social Relocation of Personal Identity as Shown by Psychoanalytic Observations of Splitting, Projection, and Introjection
- Terrorism in Perspective
- The Road to Martyrs' Square: A Journey into the World of the Suicide Bomber
- Transnational Terrorism: A Chronology of Events, 1968-1979
- Adversarial Risk Analysis for Counterterrorism Modeling
- To Bargain or Not to Bargain: That is the Question
- Terrorist psycho-logic: Terrorist behavior as a product of psychological forces.
- Identifying and Structuring the Objectives of Terrorists
- Cognitive and Motivational Biases in Decision and Risk Analysis
- Personality Characteristics of “Self Martyrs”/“Suicide Bombers” and Organizers of Suicide Attacks
- The Challenge of Biological Terrorism
- Are Terrorists Really Rational? The Palestinian Example
Cited by
- Between a rock and a hard place of geopolitically sensitive threats – critical incidents and decision inertia
- A Bayesian network methodology for optimal security management of critical infrastructures
- Low-capacity utilization of process plants: A cost-robust approach to tackle man-made domino effects
- Tackling uncertainty in security assessment of critical infrastructures: Dempster-Shafer Theory vs. Credal Sets Theory
- A new approach to protect soft-targets from terrorist attacks
- On the learning patterns and adaptive behavior of terrorist organizations
- The Role of Decision Analysis in Risk Analysis: A Retrospective
- The Presence of Revenge in Conflict and the Possibility of Complete Deterrence
- Deterrence against Terrorist Attacks in Sports‐Mega Events: A Method to Identify the Optimal Portfolio of Defensive Countermeasures
- Reducing the risk of intentional domino effects in process plants: A risk‐based minimax strategy
- RATIONALITY OF TERRORIST ACTS , COUNTERTERRORISM AND RISK ANALYSIS UDC 327 . 88
- Conceptualizing State Counterterrorism
- Introducing Terrorist Archetypes : Using Terrorist Objectives and Behavior to Predict New , Complex , and Changing Threats
Related papers
- Vamvakas v. Custodian of Enemy Property and Another.
- Learning about simulated adversaries from human defenders using interactive cyber-defense games
- Learning About Simulated Adversaries from Human Defenders using Interactive Cyber-Defense Games
- Toward Effective Evaluation of Cyber Defense: Threat Based Adversary Emulation Approach
- Sticking to their Guns: The Missing RMA for Cybersecurity