The Ethical Brain: The Science of Our Moral Dilemmas
Explore this paper's citation graph
- Type
- book
- Published
- 2005-04-29
- Cited by
- 248
- References
- 0
- OpenAlex
- https://openalex.org/W1685152655
- Semantic Scholar
- https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:70846759
Keywords
Psychology, Political science
References
No references recorded for this paper.
Cited by
- Applied Metascience of Neuroethics
- Narrating the Brain
- Brain-based ethics?
- Review of Enrique Bonete, Neuroética Práctica (Practical Neuroethics)
- Ethical Blurs of The Ethical Brain
- Chapter I Reflexing Interfaces
- "ES IST SCHWER, EIN MENSCH ZU WERDEN" A PSZICHOANALÍZIS TRAGIKUS HUMANIZMUSA
- A review of ethics education in healthcare literature and the case for a dialogical pedagogy
- An Affective Model for Unauthorized Sharing of Software
- Moral Cognition and Computational Theory
- CONFLICTO DE INTERESES Conflict of interest
- Fundamentals of the Stem Cell Debate
- Anthropology of the Brain: Consciousness, Culture, and Free Will
- Creating a culture of values that will promote sustained excellence in competitive football
- Critical Pedagogy and the Everyday Classroom
- The Neuroscience of Freedom and Creativity: Our Predictive Brain
- Forms of Truth and the Unity of Knowledge
- Neuronas y valores
- (Mis)Reading Natalie: The Viewer’s Cognitive Processes and the Unreadable in Christopher Nolan’s Memento
- Translating Neuroethics: Reflections from Muslim Ethics
Related papers
- Descarte's error : emotion, reason, and the human brain
- Neuroethics for the new millenium.
- An fMRI Investigation of Emotional Engagement in Moral Judgment
- The emotional dog and its rational tail: a social intuitionist approach to moral judgment.
- For the law, neuroscience changes nothing and everything.
- The neural bases of cognitive conflict and control in moral judgment.
- Neuroethics: Defining the Issues in Theory, Practice, and Policy
- Moral Minds: How Nature Designed Our Universal Sense of Right and Wrong
- The Illusion of Conscious Will
- Imaging or Imagining? A Neuroethics Challenge Informed by Genetics