CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomized trials
Explore this paper's citation graph
Summary
A CONSORT Group meeting to update the 2001 Statement is introduced, and the result of that process, CONSORT 2010, is introduced.
- Type
- article
- Published
- 2010-03-24
- Cited by
- 3,938
- References
- 50
- Access
- Open access
- OpenAlex
- https://openalex.org/W2007572208
- Semantic Scholar
- https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:10342728
Keywords
Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials, Randomized controlled trial, Checklist, Medicine, Research design
References
- CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials
- The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel group randomized trials
- Does the CONSORT checklist improve the quality of reports of randomised controlled trials? A systematic review
- What is meant by intention to treat analysis? Survey of published randomised controlled trials
- International committee of medical journal editors.
- Improving the quality of reporting in randomised controlled trials.
- Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement.
- Better Reporting of Harms in Randomized Trials: An Extension of the CONSORT Statement
- Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials.
- Systematic reviews in health care: Assessing the quality of controlled clinical trials.
- The quality of reports of randomised trials in 2000 and 2006: comparative study of articles indexed in PubMed
- CONSORT for reporting randomised trials in journal and conference abstracts.
- What is missing from descriptions of treatment in trials and reviews?
- Epidemiology and reporting of randomised trials published in PubMed journals.
- Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Study Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias
- Reporting Randomized, Controlled Trials of Herbal Interventions: An Elaborated CONSORT Statement
- Reporting number needed to treat and absolute risk reduction in randomized controlled trials.
- Randomized trials stopped early for benefit: a systematic review.
- Empirical evidence for selective reporting of outcomes in randomized trials: comparison of protocols to published articles.
- Extending the CONSORT statement to randomized trials of nonpharmacologic treatment: explanation and elaboration.
Cited by
- Comparison of titanium-nitride-oxide-coated stents with zotarolimus-eluting stents for coronary revascularization a randomized controlled trial.
- Indirect comparison of lixisenatide versus neutral protamine Hagedorn insulin as add-on to metformin and sulphonylurea in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus
- Remote ischemic post-conditioning of the lower limb during primary percutaneous coronary intervention safely reduces enzymatic infarct size in anterior myocardial infarction: a randomized controlled trial.
- Pharmacognosy of black cohosh: the phytochemical and biological profile of a major botanical dietary supplement.
- Long‐term low‐dose maintenance pegylated interferon may prevent decompensation in cirrhotic patients with portal hypertension: Are we there yet?
- How to get your paper accepted for publication.
- Intention to Treat Analysis: Are We Really Doing It?: Reply
- Effectiveness of Group Versus Individual Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy in Patients With Abridged Somatization Disorder: A Randomized Controlled Trial
- Randomized trials in colorectal surgery: a will‐o'‐the‐wisp
- Early multimodal rehabilitation following lumbar disc surgery: a randomised clinical trial comparing the effects of two exercise programmes on clinical outcome and lumbar multifidus muscle function
- Third-generation zotarolimus-eluting and everolimus-eluting stents in all-comer patients requiring a percutaneous coronary intervention (DUTCH PEERS): a randomised, single-blind, multicentre, non-inferiority trial.
- The CARE Guidelines: Consensus-based Clinical Case Report Guideline Development
- Live Birth is the Correct Outcome for Clinical Trials Evaluating Therapy for the Infertile Couple
- Efficacy of a dual-ring wound protector for prevention of incisional surgical site infection after Whipple's procedure (pancreaticoduodenectomy) with preoperatively-placed intrabiliary stents: protocol for a randomised controlled trial
- The effect of folic acid supplementation with ferrous sulfate on the linear and ponderal growth of children aged 6–24 months: a randomized controlled trial
- Effects of balloon inflation and cough trick methods on easing pain in children during the drawing of venous blood samples: a randomized controlled trial.
- Probability screening in manuscripts submitted to biomedical journals – an effective tool or a statistical quagmire?
- Results of a Multimodal Program During Hospitalization in Obese COPD Exacerbated Patients
- In-class didactic versus self-directed teaching of the probe-based confocal laser endomicroscopy (pCLE) criteria for Barrett’s esophagus
- Efficacy of the Type 2 Diabetes Prevention Using LifeStyle Education Program RCT.
Related papers
- Are CONSORT checklists submitted by authors adequately reflecting what information is actually reported in published papers?
- Establishing criteria of rigour and relevance in interaction design research
- [The CONSORT statement for cluster randomised trials].
- Methodological rigour in preclinical urology: a systematic review reporting research quality over a 14‐year period
- Methodological Rigour in Preclinical Urological Studies: a 14-year systematic review to increase research quality and value
- Experience-informed design: Information exchange to and from diverse experience research
- The 2001 STRICTA Recommendations for Reporting Acupuncture Research: A Review with Implications for Improving Controlled Clinical Trial Design
- A systematic review of the usage of flow diagram in cluster randomized trials