The Evolutionary Psychology of Human Mate Choice

Keywords

Evolutionary psychology, Mate choice, Sexual selection, Psychology, Extant taxon

References

• Sex differences in the brain.Leslie Ralph Kelly — 1992
• Symmetry and perceived facial attractiveness: a monozygotic co-twin comparison.Shahan K. Sarrafian — 1999
• Sexual selection, sensory systems and sensory exploitation.Michael J. Ryan — 1990
• Handbook of personality psychology.R. Hogan, John A. Johnson, S. Briggs — 1997
• Age preferences in mates reflect sex differences in human reproductive strategies. Commentary. Author's responseHank Davis — 1994
• Hunter-Gatherers of the New WorldKim Hill, Ana Hurtado — 1989
• Mate choice among the Nebraska Amish of central PennsylvaniaJames P. Hurd — 1981
• On Plato's SymposiumLéo Strauss, Seth Benardete — 1951
• Defenders of the truth : the sociobiology debateUllica Segerstråle — 2001
• Gusii of KenyaRobert A. Levine, Donald T. Campbell — 1972
• The Evolution of Human Behavior: Primate Models.Vernon Reynolds, Warren G. Kinzey — 1987
• The cooperative gene : how Mendel's demon explains the evolution of complex beingsMark Ridley — 2001
• Handbook of Evolutionary Psychology : Ideas, Issues, and ApplicationsCharles Crawford, Dennis L. Krebs — 1998
• Primate Sexuality: Comparative Studies of the Prosimians, Monkeys, Apes, and HumansAlan F. Dixson — 1998
• Why We Love: The Nature and Chemistry of Romantic LoveHelen Fisher — 2004
• A Natural History of Rape: Biological Bases of Sexual CoercionR. Thornhill, C. Palmer — 2000
• The Evolution Of Desire: Strategies of Human MatingDavid M. Buss — 1994
• The evolution of magnanimityJames L. Boone — 1998
• Women's Work: The First 20,000 Years: Women, Cloth, and Society in Early TimesNancy L. Ashton, Elizabeth Wayland Barber — 1997
• Encyclopedia of InsectsVincent H. Resh, Ring T. Cardé — 2009

Cited by

• Does sexual selection explain human sex differences in aggression?Yongnian Ni, Ping Qui, Serge Kokot — 2009
• Why Do the Karo Batak Prefer Women with Big Feet?Geoff Kushnick — 2013
• 'Better Make It a Double': Perceived Relatedness Increases Reported AttractivenessBenjamin R Ainley — 2011
• Frontiers in cognitive psychologyMichael A Vanchevsky — 2006
• Cortisol response to the presence of same and opposite sex individuals in various social environmentsSvetlana Chesser — 2013
• Sex differences in marital satisfaction and happiness: the contribrution of children, attractiveness, and financial statusLisa M. Dillon — 2012
• The Human Polygyny Index and its Ecological Correlates: Testing Sexual Selection and Life History Theory at the Cross‐National LevelDavid P. Schmitt, Percy A. Rohde — 2013
• Visible skin condition and perception of human facial appearanceNadine Samson, Bernhard Fink, Paul J. Matts — 2009
• Sexual Size Dimorphism, Canine Dimorphism, and Male-Male Competition in PrimatesJ. Michael Plavcan — 2012
• Julgamento de atratividade facial por mulheres durante o ciclo menstrualCristina Perin — 2014
• Moving Towards a Nuanced Understanding of Human Mating Preferences and Strategies: A Critique of Evolutionary Psychologists’ Emphasis on Sex DifferencesKathryn V. Walter — 2015
• Developmental simulation of the adult cranial morphology of Australopithecus sedibaKeely B. Carlson, Darryl J. de Ruiter, Thomas J. DeWitt — 2016
• Seven dimensions of personality pathology are under sexual selection in modern SpainGemma Vall, Fernando Gutiérrez, Josep M. Peri — 2016
• Evolutionary contributions to the study of human fertilityRebecca Sear — 2015
• Is genetic diversity associated with mating success in humansHanne C. Lie, Gillian Rhodes, Leigh W. Simmons — 2010
• Advanced paternal age is associated with lower facial attractivenessSusanne Huber, Martin Fieder — 2014
• What were “owls” doing in our ancestral photoperiodic environment? Chronobiological account for the evolutionary advantage of nocturnal lifestyleArcady A. Putilov — 2014
• Chimpanzee facial symmetry: a biometric measure of chimpanzee healthJon A. Sefcek, James E. King — 2007
• It's Funny Because It's True (Because It Evokes Our Evolved Psychology)Barry X. Kuhle — 2012
• Comprehensive View of the Human Mating Process Among Young Couples in Isfahan-Iran: An Explanatory Mixed-Method StudyEffat Merghati Khoei, Tayebe Ziaei, Mehrdad Salehi — 2013

Related papers

• Repeatable female preferences, mating order and mating success in the poeciliid fish, Heterandria formosaAndrea S. Aspbury, Alexandra L. Basolo — 2002
• Sexual selection, social information and male mate choice in a promiscuous fishHeather Auld — 2016
• The effect of experimental design on the measurement of mate choice: a meta-analysisLiam R. Dougherty, David M. Shuker — 2015
• A new method for statistical detection of directional and stabilizing mating preferenceDerek A. Roff, Daphne J. Fairbairn, Alexandra Yevgenyevna Prokuda — 2017
• Male fish use prior knowledge about rivals to adjust their mate choiceDavid Bierbach, Antje Girndt, Sybille Hamfler — 2011
• The influence of female viability differences on the evolution of mate choiceIan Tomlinson, Peter O’Donald — 1996
• Meta-analysis shows the evidence for context-dependent mating behaviour is inconsistent or weak across animals.Liam R. Dougherty — 2021
• Meta-analysis shows that context-dependent mating behaviour is inconsistent or weak across animalsLiam R. Dougherty — 2020
• Frequency-dependent sexual selection as a result of variations in fitness at breeding timePeter O’Donald — 1973