TRISS methodology: an inappropriate tool for comparing outcomes between trauma centers.
Explore this paper's citation graph
Summary
The TRISS methodology is not a reliable tool for comparing outcomes between trauma centers and has an unacceptably high misclassification rate in patients with severe trauma.
- Type
- article
- Published
- 2001-09-01
- Cited by
- 80
- References
- 8
- OpenAlex
- https://openalex.org/W1544624543
- Semantic Scholar
- https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:34979044
Keywords
Trauma center, Medicine, Glasgow Coma Scale, Injury Severity Score, Revised Trauma Score
References
- TRISS methodology in trauma: the need for alternatives
- Results of a multi-institutional outcome assessment: results of a structured peer review of TRISS-designated unexpected outcomes.
- Is outcome worse in a small volume Canadian trauma centre?
- A revision of the Trauma Score.
- Limitations of the TRISS method for interhospital comparisons: a multihospital study.
- Patient volume per surgeon does not predict survival in adult level I trauma centers.
- A modification of the injury severity score that both improves accuracy and simplifies scoring.
Cited by
- Das externe Qualitätsmanagement in der klinischen Schwerverletztenversorgung
- Correlation of Revised Trauma Score and Injury Severity Score (TRISS) Predicted Probability of Survival with Peer-Reviewed Determination of Trauma Deaths
- Valoración de parámetros clínicos como predictores del gasto total y de su distribución en el paciente politraumatizado
- An evolution of trauma care evaluation
- Major trauma in Western Australia and the effects of distance, time and remoteness on mortality
- Demographic Patterns and Outcomes of Patients in Level I Trauma Centers in Three International Trauma Systems
- Norwegian survival prediction model in trauma: modelling effects of anatomic injury, acute physiology, age, and co-morbidity
- Association of direct helicopter versus ground transport and in-hospital mortality in trauma patients: a propensity score analysis.
- Survival benefit of transfer to tertiary trauma centers for major trauma patients initially presenting to nontertiary trauma centers.
- Are all trauma centers created equally? A statewide analysis.
- Mortality benefit of transfer to level I versus level II trauma centers for head-injured patients.
- External validation of the Norwegian survival prediction model in trauma after major trauma in Southern Finland
- Trauma outcome in a Norwegian regional hospital
- The Effect of Trauma Center Designation and Trauma Volume on Outcome in Specific Severe Injuries
- Canadian benchmarks in trauma.
- Emergency medicine: Are we the systems specialists?
- A New Method for Evaluating Trauma Centre Outcome Performance: TRAM-Adjusted Mortality Estimates
- Trauma survival prediction in Asian population: a modification of TRISS to improve accuracy
- Identification of dynamic prehospital changes with continuous vital signs acquisition.
- Using population-based critical care data to evaluate trauma outcomes.
Related papers
- Beyond Mortality: Does Trauma-related Injury Severity Score Predict Complications or Lengths of Stay Using a Large Administrative Dataset
- 중증 외상에서 Glasgow Coma Scale(GCS) 운동반응의 의의
- Should air medical patients be transferred on helipad or trauma bay?
- Changes in the outcomes of severe trauma patients from 15-year experience in a Western European trauma ICU of Emilia Romagna region (1996–2010). A population cross-sectional survey study
- Interest of the MGAP score on in-hospital trauma patients: Comparison with TRISS, ISS and NISS scores.
- External Validation of the Emergency Trauma Score for Early Prediction of Mortality in Trauma Patients*
- The Impact of Discharging Minimally Injured Trauma Patient: Does Age Play a Role in Trauma Admission?
- Use of the reverse shock index for identifying high-risk patients in a five-level triage system
- The impact of implementing a 24/7 open trauma bed protocol in the surgical intensive care unit on throughput and outcomes