Global Change and Sustainable Development. A modelling perspective for the next decade
Explore this paper's citation graph
- Type
- article
- Published
- 1994-06-30
- Cited by
- 82
- References
- 124
- OpenAlex
- https://openalex.org/W1500742417
- Semantic Scholar
- https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:128917232
Keywords
Global change, Environmental change, Earth system science, Context (archaeology), Perspective (graphical)
References
- Climate Forcing by Anthropogenic Aerosols
- World conservation strategy. Living resource conservation for sustainable development.
- A framework for research on the human dimensions of global environmental change
- Environmental policy performance indicators : a study on the development of indicators for environmental policy in the Netherlands
- Some perspectives of the major biogeochemical cycles.
- Futures for the Mediterranean basin : the Blue Plan
- Concern for tomorrow. A national environmental survey 1985-2010
- Principles of systems : text and workbook, chapters 1 through 10
- The Global biogeochemical sulphur cycle
- Indicators of Environmental Quality
- Dynamic models for sustainable development
- Simulation modelling of environmental problems
- Sea level rise : a global vulnerability assessment vulnerability assessments for population, coastal wetlands and rice production on a global scale
- Developing climate scenarios from equilibrium GCM results
- Scientists of Gaia
- Climate change : the IPCC scientific assessment
- Research on the human components of global change: Next steps
- Image: An Integrated Model to Assess the Greenhouse Effect
- Environmental indices: Theory and practice
- Two types of global environmental change: Definitional and spatial-scale issues in their human dimensions
Cited by
- Open Up: Increasing the accountability of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Netherlands by utilizing the International Aid Transparency Initiative for monitoring purposes
- Integrated assessment of potential health impact of global environmental change: Prospects and limitations
- Uncertainty in Integrated Assessment Modelling
- Integrated assessment of the grand nutrient cycles
- Uncertainty in life cycle impact assessment of toxic releases practical experiences - arguments for a reductionalistic approach?
- Development of flood management strategies for the Rhine and Meuse basins in the context of integrated river management
- Geographical information systems and dynamic models : development and application of a prototype spatial modelling language
- Integrated Environmental Assessment of Nutrient Emissions in a Mediterranean catchment: A case study in La Tordera, Catalonia
- Integrated Assessment Modeling: Modules for Cooperation
- Syndromes of global change
- Integrating ecological knowledge with legal instruments for nature conservation in river management
- Uncertainty in perspective
- Integrated water management strategies for the Rhine and Meuse basins in a changing environment
- Sustainable world through sustainable materials and integrated biorefineries
- Integrated System Approach to Sustainability Bio-Fuels and Bio-Refineries
- Health impacts of climate change and ozone depletion: an ecoepidemiologic modeling approach.
- Global atmospheric change and human health: an integrated modelling approach
- Understanding and managing the complexity of urban systems under climate change
- Integrated assessment models and response function models: pros and cons for sustainable development indices design
- The varied contexts of environmental decision problems and their implications for decision support
Related papers
- Perspectives on global change : the TARGETS approach
- Image: An Integrated Model to Assess the Greenhouse Effect
- Visions for a sustainable Europe
- A Cultural Perspective On the Structure and Implementation of Global Environmental Agreements
- Learning from integrated assessment of climate change
- Uncertainty in perspective
- Integrated assessment and environmental policy making: In pursuit of usefulness
- Integrated assessment modeling of global climate change: Transparent rational tool for policy making or opaque screen hiding value‐laden assumptions?