5-year follow-up after primary percutaneous coronary intervention with a paclitaxel-eluting stent versus a bare-metal stent in acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: a follow-up study of the PASSION (Paclitaxel-Eluting Versus Conventional Stent in Myocardial Infarction with ST-Segment Ele

Explore this paper's citation graph

Summary

No significant difference in major adverse cardiac events was observed in PES compared with BMS in primary percutaneous coronary intervention for STEMI, and no difference in the incidence of definite or probable ST was seen, although very late ST was almost exclusively seen after the use of PES.

Type
article
Published
2011-01-01
Cited by
130
References
25

Keywords

Medicine, Myocardial infarction, Percutaneous coronary intervention, Internal medicine, Cardiology

References

Cited by

Related papers