Computer-mediated scaffolding for collaborative argumentation on socio-scientific issues
Explore this paper's citation graph
Summary
A computer-supported collaborative learning tool to support and scaffold student argumentation, called ArgueMint, is designed and implemented and a design research study was undertaken to examine how the so-called "ware" was used by pairs of students in a face-to-face setting, and to improve it’s usefulness and usability.
- Type
- dissertation
- Published
- 2010-05-06
- Cited by
- 1
- References
- 81
- Access
- Open access
- OpenAlex
- https://openalex.org/W39037041
- Semantic Scholar
- https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:151267968
Keywords
Argumentation theory, Usability, Argument (complex analysis), Computer science, Mathematics education
References
- Ajax Design Patterns
- Learning Together and Alone. Cooperative, Competitive, and Individualistic Learning. Fourth Edition.
- Enterprise AJAX: Strategies for Building High Performance Web Applications
- The Teaching of Science as Inquiry
- The role of tutoring in problem solving.
- The effectiveness of cooperative learning with trainee teachers
- Towards a design framework for mobile computer-supported collaborative learning
- An STS case study about students' decision making on the waste issue
- Who Reasons Well? Two Studies of Informal Reasoning Among Children of Different Grade, Ability, and Knowledge Levels
- Design-Based Research Methods for Studying Learning in Context: Introduction
- Fostering students' knowledge and argumentation skills through dilemmas in human genetics
- The magical number seven plus or minus two: some limits on our capacity for processing information.
- Learning to Reason via Instruction in Argumentation.
- Why a Diagram is (Sometimes) Worth Ten Thousand Words
- Science education for everyday life: Evidence‐based practice
- Finding Meaning in Science: Lifeworld, Identity,and Self
- National Science Education Standards
- Socio-cognitive dynamics of knowledge building in the work of 9- and 10-year-olds
- A scaffolding framework to support the construction of evidence-based arguments among middle school students
- Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches
Cited by
Related papers
- The progression of collaborative argumentation among English learners: A qualitative study
- Argumentation-Based Computer Supported Collaborative Learning (ABCSCL): A Synthesis of 15 Years of Research.
- Analyzing the quality of argumentation supported by personally-seeded discussions
- Applying Argumentation Approach in STEM Education: A Case Study of the European Student Parliaments Project in Greece
- Personally‐Seeded Discussions to Scaffold Online Argumentation
- Disparate arguments in mathematics classrooms
- Promoting argumentation in primary science contexts: an analysis of students' interactions in formal and informal learning environments
- Assessing Dialogic Argumentation in Online Environments to Relate Structure, Grounds, and Conceptual Quality