How and Why to Replace the 14-Day Rule
Explore this paper's citation graph
Summary
It is argued that the 14-day rule for embryo research should be open to change, but that this possibility must be addressed through early and thorough discussion involving a wide range of publics and other stakeholders.
- Type
- article
- Published
- 2018-07-16
- Cited by
- 30
- References
- 67
- Access
- Open access
- OpenAlex
- https://openalex.org/W30148047
- Semantic Scholar
- https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:52080622
Keywords
Humanities, Philosophy
References
- Scientists in the dock: criminal law and the regulation of science.
- Whose view of life? : embryos, cloning, and stem cells
- The Value of Life: An Introduction to Medical Ethics
- ETHICS, EMBRYOS, AND EVIDENCE: A LOOK BACK AT WARNOCK.
- Institutional Ecology, `Translations' and Boundary Objects: Amateurs and Professionals in Berkeley's Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907-39
- Crossing Species Boundaries
- Do human cells have rights?
- Creating the ‘ethics industry': Mary Warnock, in vitro fertilization and the history of bioethics in Britain
- A method to recapitulate early embryonic spatial patterning in human embryonic stem cells
- The Ethics of Funding Embryonic Stem Cell Research: A Catholic Viewpoint
- Splitting Embryos on the Slippery Slope: Ethics and Public Policy
- The Embryo Research Debate: Science and the Politics of Reproduction. By Michael Mulkay. Cambridge: CUP, 1997. £35.00/$59.95 (hardback); £12.95 (paperback).
- Going to the roots of the stem cell controversy.
- Life, Liberty and the Defense of Dignity: The Challenge for Bioethics
- Moral Status: Obligations to Persons and Other Living Things
- Human embryonic stem cell research: why the discarded-created-distinction cannot be based on the potentiality argument.
- The Warnock Report: A Review. Dame Mary Warnock (Chairman), Report of the Committee of Inquiry into Human Fertilisation and Embryology, London, Her Majesty’s Stationery Office, £6.40
- Stem cell research, personhood and sentience.
- THE AMBIGUITY OF THE EMBRYO: ETHICAL INCONSISTENCY IN THE HUMAN EMBRYONIC STEM CELL DEBATE
- Life's Dominion: An Argument about Abortion, Euthanasia, and Individual Freedom
Cited by
- Editing the Reactive Genome: Towards a Postgenomic Ethics of Germline Editing
- CRISPR in context: towards a socially responsible debate on embryo editing
- Micro-Engineered Models of Development Using Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells
- Discarding IVF embryos: reporting on global practices
- Adapting the 14-day rule for embryo research to encompass evolving technologies
- Social and Ethical Impact of Advanced Artificial and Biological Enhancements
- The moral status of human embryo‐like structures: potentiality matters?
- Embryo experimentation: is there a case for moving beyond the ‘14-day rule’
- National human embryo and embryoid research policies: a survey of 22 top research-intensive countries.
- Human cerebral organoids and consciousness: a double-edged sword
- Potential Ethical Problems with Human Cerebral Organoids: Consciousness and Moral Status of Future Brains in a Dish.
- Emerging moral status issues
- The ethics of human-embryoids model: a call for consistency
- A framework for the responsible reform of the 14-day rule in human embryo research
- Revisiting selected ethical aspects of current clinical in vitro fertilization (IVF) practice
- Bioethics in human embryology: the double-edged sword of embryo research
- Are we ready for the revision of the 14-day rule? Implications from Chinese legislations guiding human embryo and embryoid research
- Pseudo‐embryology and personhood: How embryological pseudoscience helps structure the American abortion debate
- Ethical, legal, regulatory, and policy issues concerning embryoids: a systematic review of the literature
- LEGAL PROTECTION FOR BORN BABIES FROM THE ECTOLIFE PROGRAM
Related papers
No related papers recorded.