Autism, intellectual disability, and a challenge to our understanding of proxy consent

Explore this paper's citation graph

Summary

This paper focuses on a hypothetical case that represents an intervention request familiar to those who work with individuals with intellectual disability and finds that none of the three primary means of justifying proxy consent apply to Stacy's case.

Type
article
Published
2016-10-26
Cited by
11
References
31

Keywords

Philosophy, Humanities

References

Cited by

Related papers

No related papers recorded.