Induction of labour at term with vaginal prostaglandins preparations: A randomised controlled trial of Prostin vs Propess
Explore this paper's citation graph
Summary
The data suggest that both Propess and Prostin are safe and effective in induction of labour, for either primips or multips, however, ProstIn use is more cost-effective.
- Type
- article
- Published
- 2006-01-01
- Cited by
- 22
- References
- 16
- OpenAlex
- https://openalex.org/W17071427
- Semantic Scholar
- https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:34001598
Keywords
Political science
References
- Prostaglandins in preinduction cervical ripening. Meta-analysis of worldwide clinical experience.
- Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Induction of Labour full guidance published by the RCOG. RCOG Clinical Effectiveness Support Unit, London
- [Comparative efficacy of vaginal insert and dinoprostone gel for cervical ripening at term in current practice].
- Cervical ripening and labor induction with a controlled-release dinoprostone vaginal insert: a meta-analysis.
- An intravaginal controlled‐release prostaglandin E2 pessary for cervical ripening and initiation of labor at term
- Cervical ripening and labor induction with a controlled-release dinoprostone vaginal insert: a meta-analysis.
- Is propess a better method of induction of labour in nulliparous women
- Prepidil compared to Propess for cervical ripening.
- [Dinoprostone: slow release vaginal insert (Propess) and intracervical gel (Prepidil) for the induction of labour with unriped cervix].
- Review of prostaglandin use in labour induction.
- American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists
- Review of Propess Ð a controlled release dinoprostone ( prostaglandin E 2 ) pessary
Cited by
- Efficiency of dinoprostone insert for cervical ripening and induction of labor in women of full-term pregnancy compared with dinoprostone gel: A meta-analysis.
- Évaluation des pratiques professionnelles : étude de l'impact de l'humidification du Propess® sur son innocuité, son efficacité et son acceptabilité
- Induction of labour: A comparison between controlled‐release dinoprostone vaginal pessary (Cervidil®) and dinoprostone intravaginal gel (Prostin E2®)
- Vaginal prostaglandin (PGE2 and PGF2a) for induction of labour at term.
- Outcome of Induction of Labour in Nulliparous Women Following Replacement of Cervidil with Prostin
- Induction of labor and pain: a randomized trial between two vaginal preparations of dinoprostone in nulliparous women with an unfavorable cervix
- Biochemical and biophysical predictors of the response to the induction of labor in nulliparous postterm pregnancy.
- Role of Intracervical Dinoprostone Gel Administration versus Vaginal Administration of Oral Prostaglandin E2 Tablet for Induction of Labour
- [Comparative study between pregnancies induced for premature rupture of membranes and for prolonged pregnancy].
- Déclenchement artificiel et direction du travail
- Which method is best for the induction of labour? A systematic review, network meta-analysis and cost-effectiveness analysis.
- Propess versus Prostin: There is an alternative way to induce labour
- Prostaglandin-E2 deficiency during late pregnancy and the associated increase in interleukin-1β derived from periaortic lymph nodes lead to abortion.
- A prospective randomized comparative study of the efficacy of sustained release vaginal insert versus intracervical gel in primigravidae at term pregnancy
- Comparison of the Dinoprostone Vaginal Insert and Dinoprostone Tablet for the Induction of Labor in Primipara: A Retrospective Cohort Study
- Postterm pregnancy
- A comparative study between dinoprostone pessary and dinoprostone gel for induction of labor and neonatal outcome
- Methods of induction of labour: a network meta-analysis.
- Guideline Development Group
- Vaginal prostaglandin (PGE2 and PGF2a) for induction of labour at term.
Related papers
No related papers recorded.