Topographic change in ERP due to discrimination of geometric figures in the peripheral visual field.

D. Clayton Brown · International Journal of Psychophysiology · 2006

Summary

The neurophysiological aspects of discrimination of geometric figures with different eccentricities and cerebral processing concerned with N1 and P2 might play an important role in the perception and recognition of visual objects in the peripheral visual field are examined.

Type: article
Published: 2006-10-01
Cited by: 7
References: 38
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2006.02.007
PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16650494/
OpenAlex: https://openalex.org/W16650494
Semantic Scholar: https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:26522636

Keywords

Spring (device), Political science, Demography, Geography, Sociology

References

A Topographic Study of ERPs Elicited by Visual Feature DiscriminationBrian F. O’Donnell, Joan M. Swearer, Lloyd T. Smith — 2004
Methods of Analysis of Brain Electrical and Magnetic SignalsA. Gevins, A Rémond — 1987
Analysis of visual behaviorDavid Ingle, Melvyn A. Goodale, R. J. W. Mansfield — 1982
Eye guidance in reading and scene perceptionG. Underwood — 1998
Two cortical visual systemsLeslie G. Ungerleider — 1982
Stimulus-selective properties of inferior temporal neurons in the macaqueRobert Desimone, TD Albright, C G Gross — 1984
Static and Dynamic Functional Visual FieldsMitsuo Ikeda, Keiji Uchikawa, Shinya Saida — 1979
Reference-free identification of components of checkerboard-evoked multichannel potential fields.Dietrich Lehmann, Wolfgang Skrandies — 1980
Ferrier Lecture - The organization of the visual cortex in manGordon M. Holmes — 1945
Comparison of the mechanisms of latency shift in pattern reversal visual evoked potential induced by blurring and contrast reduction.Vítor Tumas, Américo Ceiki Sakamoto — 1997
Visual sensory units and the minimal angle of resolution.Frank W. Weymouth — 1958
Identification of early visual evoked potential generators by retinotopic and topographic analysesVincent P. Clark, Silu Fan, Steven A. Hillyard — 1994
A first comparison of the human multifocal visual evoked magnetic field and visual evoked potential.Lihong Wang, Colin Barber, Ryusuke Kakigi — 2001
Visual Evoked Potentials to Geometric Forms: Effects of Spatial OrientationMotoo Ito, Tatsuya Sugata, Hiroshi Kuwabara — 1997
Speed of processing in the human visual systemSimon J. Thorpe, Denis Fize, Catherine Marlot — 1996
Random dots blinking: a new approach to elucidate the activities of the extrastriate cortex in humansTomohiro Okusa, Yoshiki Kaneoke, Sachiko Koyama — 1998
Segments of event-related potential map series reveal landscape changes with visual attention and subjective contours.Daniel Brandeis, Dietrich Lehmann — 1989
Magnification factor and receptive field size in foveal striate cortex of the monkeyBruce M. Dow, Abraham Z. Snyder, R. G. Vautin — 2004
WOUNDS OF THE VISUAL PATHWAYJ. M. K. Spalding — 1952
Distribution of cones in human and monkey retina: individual variability and radial asymmetry.Christine A. Curcio, Kenneth R. Sloan, Orin Packer — 1987

Cited by

Hierarchical error processing during motor controlOlave E. Krigolson — 2007
Electrophysiological correlates of figure-ground segregation directly reflect perceptual saliency.Sirko Straube, Cathleen Grimsen, Manfred Fahle — 2010
Attentional orienting induced by arrows and eye-gaze compared with an endogenous cue.Debora Brignani, Daniela Guzzon, Carlo A. Marzi — 2009
Can illusory deviant stimuli be used as attentional distractors to record vMMN in a passive three stimulus oddball paradigm?Maria Flynn, Alki Liasis, Mark Gardner — 2009
The magnitude of the central visual field could be detected by active middle-late processing of ERPs.Maojuan Li, Xiaoqin Liu, Qianqian Li — 2016
Consumers’ Different Neural Activity and Attitude to the Leading Brand and ImitatorXuefeng Zhang, Fu Guo, Sen Li — 2018

Related papers

No related papers recorded.