WhatTheySaid: Enriching UK Parliament Debates with Semantic Web
Explore this paper's citation graph
Summary
What They Said is an initiative to solve the problem of lack of efficient way to deeply analysis the debate data by applying natural language processing and semantic Web technologies to enrich UK Parliament Debate archives and publish them as linked data.
- Type
- article
- Published
- 2014-10-21
- Cited by
- 0
- References
- 5
- Access
- Open access
- OpenAlex
- https://openalex.org/W8065675
- Semantic Scholar
- https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:15464659
Keywords
Parliament, Semantic Web, Computer science, Transparency (behavior), Publication
References
- From Frequency to Meaning: Vector Space Models of Semantics
- Creating Enriched YouTube Media Fragments With NERD Using Timed-Text
- Bringing Parliamentary Debates to the Semantic Web
- Using TF-IDF to Determine Word Relevance in Document Queries
- Detection , Representation , and Exploitation of Events in the Semantic Web
Cited by
No citing papers recorded for this paper.
Related papers
- Bringing Parliamentary Debates to the Semantic Web
- DebateVis: Visualizing Political Debates for Non-Expert Users
- Deliberation on the Internet: How Do Citizens Discuss On-line? The French Ducsai Debate Case Study
- Perspective Analysis for Online Debates
- Building an Architecture of Participation? Political Parties and Web 2.0 in Britain
- Web historiography and Internet Studies: Challenges and perspectives
- Information politics on the Web
- Web 2.0: Defining the Undefined or a New Social Order?
- The ‘New Water Culture’ on the Web: an issue network analysis